Search Details

Word: friedrichã (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Throughout most of the debate, though a slim majority of the packed Science Center audience admitted to eating meat, Hopkin conceded Friedrich??s arguments about the immorality of being a carnivore in today’s world. PETA seemed downright reasonable...

Author: By Alex M. Mcleese | Title: PETA Debate: On Tolstoy and Bonzai Trees | 9/13/2009 | See Source »

Hopkin and questioners from the audience rarely presented compelling reasons to dispute the main thrust of Friedrich??s well-supported argument. The PETA leader argued that facts overwhelmingly show that eating meat is bad for the environment, for the world's poorest, and for the conscious experiences of animals. Instead of disputing Friedrich's figures, Hopkin and others raised abstract intellectual questions heard in Social Studies 10 and “Justice”: How can we compare animal pain with human pain? And can animals be a part of the social contract...

Author: By Alex M. Mcleese | Title: PETA Debate: On Tolstoy and Bonzai Trees | 9/13/2009 | See Source »

...poorest citizens, and for the conscious experiences of animals. “There really is no such thing as a meat-eating environmentalism,” he said. “And on that ground alone eating meat is unethical.” Instead of disputing Friedrich??s practical moral arguments, Hopkin and Harvard students in the audience asked questions that could have come from Social Studies 10 or “Justice”: How can we compare animal pain with human pain? And can animals be a part of the social contract? Hopkin conceded that today?...

Author: By Alex M. Mcleese, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Vegetarian Society Holds Debate on Meat-Eating | 9/13/2009 | See Source »

Throughout most of the debate, though a slim majority of the packed Science Center audience admitted to eating meat, Hopkin conceded Friedrich??s arguments about the immorality of being a carnivore in today’s world. PETA seemed downright reasonable...

Author: By Alex M. Mcleese | Title: PETA Debate: On Tolstoy and Bonzai Trees | 9/12/2009 | See Source »

Hopkin and questioners from the audience rarely presented compelling reasons to dispute the main thrust of Friedrich??s well-supported argument. The PETA leader argued that facts overwhelmingly show that eating meat is bad for the environment, for the world's poorest, and for the conscious experiences of animals. Instead of disputing Friedrich's figures, Hopkin and others raised abstract intellectual questions heard in Social Studies 10 and “Justice”: How can we compare animal pain with human pain? And can animals be a part of the social contract...

Author: By Alex M. Mcleese | Title: PETA Debate: On Tolstoy and Bonzai Trees | 9/12/2009 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | Next