Search Details

Word: genderism (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...tunnel visioned” by virtue of the fact that we read the core texts of our discipline before problematizing those texts and putting them into dialogue with the work occurring in other disciplines. That is, women’s studies does have a focus on women and gender as history has a focus on the historical (this hardly seems a potent critique). This does not render the work in the field uncomplex, unnuanced or unacademic. At its core, Kavulla’s critique seems to be that the work in women’s studies is somehow biased...

Author: By Jennifer C. Nash, | Title: Column on Women’s Studies Simple-Minded | 12/1/2003 | See Source »

...Larson ’05 is right on one point in her recent column (“Glass Ceilings and Hypocrisy,” Nov. 21): “relentless gender politicking” has overshadowed Carol Moseley Braun’s presidential campaign. However, it is the media, Larson included, that has engaged in this unceasing emphasis on gender. Ambassador Braun has brought her innovative and exciting message for a better America through single-payer health care, sweeping civil rights advances, logical tax policy, and a global, cooperative foreign policy across the country. The media, however, has largely disregarded...

Author: By Ryan P. Mcauliffe, | Title: Larson's Criticism of Braun Hypocritical | 12/1/2003 | See Source »

...good overview of the interests of our concentrators and the kind of work the program is doing.” So I did. Its shelves were filled with theses from the committee’s 17 years of existence. All, of course, related to women’s or gender issues; but what was intriguing about the theses was that their authors chose to become full concentrators in women’s studies at all. The titles, to be sure, were sometimes zany—“The Hymeneal Seal: Embodying Female Virginity in Early Modern England?...

Author: By Travis R. Kavulla, | Title: Studying Women's Studies | 11/25/2003 | See Source »

...through the multiplicities, problems, and promises of feminist theory and social practice alike.” Yet for a course dedicated to examining issues critically, surprisingly the tutorial’s syllabus lacks any semblance of a critical voice—none of Mansfield’s work on gender studies, nothing from Edmund Burke (a good counterpoint to John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women) or Phyllis Schlafly...

Author: By Travis R. Kavulla, | Title: Studying Women's Studies | 11/25/2003 | See Source »

...Indeed, for a class run by the government department’s “lone conservative,” the syllabus is quite heavy on feminist literature. But such balanced evaluation does not seem to have a place within the Committee on Degrees in Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies—so much so that Mansfield’s course was not even cross-listed with the committee, despite being populated mostly by undergraduates and having a clear topical connection with the committee’s work...

Author: By Travis R. Kavulla, | Title: Studying Women's Studies | 11/25/2003 | See Source »

Previous | 431 | 432 | 433 | 434 | 435 | 436 | 437 | 438 | 439 | 440 | 441 | 442 | 443 | 444 | 445 | 446 | 447 | 448 | 449 | 450 | 451 | Next