Word: gerbers
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Every so often these "language purists" warn us all of the impending danger of linguistic laxity and the proliferation of sub-standard forms into everyday speech. Much as Gerber wants to portray his desire for linguistic homogeneity and restrictiveness as consonant with the historic American values of equality and pluralism, it is in reality a poorly disguised call for institutionalized elitism. What the majority of the public is speaking is only "sub-standard" and "slang" because the author has chosen to call it that, and likewise the standardness of the speech of the privileged is purely arbitary...
...Gerber seems to imply that there is some danger of losing the power of communication if the "deterioration" of American English is allowed to continue. Obviously, if the majority of the people are speaking in a certain way, they will have no trouble communicating among themselves, and little difficulty understanding those who persist in speaking the "prestige" dialect. After all, who but the most obtuse English-speaking American would not understand "I don't know where...
...something in a slightly new fashion, such innovation will survive depending on its effectiveness and usefulness. Thus we see the application of the survival of the fittest theory to language. Changes in language that tend to obfuscate are generally the products of governments and their instruments, precisely the institutions Gerber would have institutionalize his linguistic "improvements...
...Finally, Gerber feels that we should modify our speech in order to facilitate international communication. It has never been the responsibility of any people or government to deliberately fool with its language in order to make things easier for foreigners. Would we deliberately restrict our vocabulary to use of idioms to that end, thus minimizing our own potential for expression? Of course...
...addition, Gerber fails to recognize why English has become the world's international language in the first place: its adaptability, flexibility and diversity--the last two are words Gerber uses to describe this nation--have made it most useful to people in all fields of endeavor. We see the difficulties encountered by nations like France, whose government seeks to shackle the language and protect it from foreign invasion, thus detracting from its value as a tool for international communication...