Search Details

Word: gores (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Kerry's arguments against Bush's policies, especially on an Iraq exit strategy, were nearly as thin as the President's defense of them. No, Kerry won the debate on Bush's favorite intangible: the appearance of strength. The President, who was so comfortable through three debates against Al Gore, appeared "annoyed," as Fox News's Brit Hume put it. Actually, it was worse than that: Bush seemed the lesser man. Kerry stood ramrod straight and preternaturally calm. Bush squirmed and grimaced behind his lectern. When he leaned down and in to make a point, he appeared to be ducking...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: A Race Is What We've Now Got | 10/11/2004 | See Source »

Nader went on to answer that not only had Gore won the election, it was the fault of the Democratic Party that the election had been so close in the first place...

Author: By Michael M. Grynbaum, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Nader Defends Decision To Run | 10/5/2004 | See Source »

...biggest mistake any candidate can make is to think of these as debates at all. Reality TV is more like it. "People watch these things more like they are watching Friends than the way they watch the Harvard and Yale debate societies," says Chris Lehane, who was Gore's press secretary. "They're not watching to see who scores the points. They're watching to see who they connect with and feel comfortable with...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Campaign '04: INSIDE THE DEBATE STRATEGIES | 10/4/2004 | See Source »

...again" that many Americans began to get comfortable with the idea of Reagan in the Oval Office. But more often, what voters take away from the debates is confirmation of their misgivings about a candidate: Richard Nixon's inner darkness, Gerald Ford's cluelessness, George H.W. Bush's aloofness, Gore's changeability...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Campaign '04: INSIDE THE DEBATE STRATEGIES | 10/4/2004 | See Source »

...debate isn't over when the candidates have finished their closing statements. Just as important to their campaigns will be winning the post-debate effort to spin what actually happened. It wasn't until a day or two after the first debate in 2000 that the analysis turned to Gore's exaggerated claims and his patronizing sighs. But it so neatly fit with the existing narrative about Gore that it became more important than anything else that happened that night--particularly among the vast majority of Americans who had not watched the debate with their own eyes. A study...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Campaign '04: INSIDE THE DEBATE STRATEGIES | 10/4/2004 | See Source »

Previous | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | Next