Word: got
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1880-1889
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...secure it. Willard soon made another rust and the ball was carried over the line by Gilman who thus made the score 8 to 0. No goal was kicked as the referee allowed a claim that Peabody's hand was off side when Kimball kicked the ball. Gilman got the ball again after it was brought out and made touchdown number three, but no goal was scored. Instead the ball was soon in the possession of our rushers and being passed back to Kimball he kicked a goal from the field. Trinity played very weakly at this period...
...second and third rush of the Trinity men who slipped through openings in the rush line and were thus enabled to carry the ball within a foot of our goal line. Here a fierce fight ensued and by careful blocking, Harvard prevented Trinity from gaining ground. Winslow got the ball at the third down and the ball soon went up the field to stay. Gilman, Phillips and Willard each made a touchdown but the attempts at goal were futile. The ball was then passed by Bemis to Kimball, the latter made a fine rush evading all the Trinity...
...favored one side and hindered the other. The Techs had the first kick-off and the ball was put in play at 3.16 P. M. They succeeded by a quick rally in carrying the ball some distance towards the Harvard goal, but then lost it. The man who next got it was Bemis, who made a beautiful rush and worked the ball close up to the other end of the field. Kent tried for goal but failed. The ball was brought out by the Techs and kicked off. Bemis and Gilman rushed it back and Kent tried again...
...since last May, the Cambridge men have been playing matches all the summer and fall. The game was called at about 4 P. M. Harvard kept the ball most of the time at the Cambridge goal but failed to score through poor team work. Later the Cambridge men got the ball near the Harvard goal and by quick work on their part and poor work by our defense they scored two goals in the last few minutes of the first half-hour...
...come up to some of the practice work and was decidedly loose at times. Poor tackling, several muffs by the backs and poor blocking were the noticeable errors in the play of our eleven. The Pennsylvania rush line on the other hand, stood as firm as a rock and got through much better than our team. Some of the individual play of our men was good, notably the fine tackling of Adams and Kimball, the way in which Gilman got the ball in a crowd and one or two rushes by Wesselhoeft. Holden had but little given...