Word: gramm
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...early October, and the U.S. Government was running out of money. The Treasury warned of imminent bankruptcy and bouncing benefit checks. The Senate responded by raising the national debt ceiling to more than $2 trillion. Attached to the bill was the Gramm-Rudman Amendment, a dramatic proposal to reduce the federal deficit to zero in five years--and to show that Senate Republicans are serious about reducing deficits. The problem was now with the House...
...early November, and the U.S. Government is still running out of money. A House-Senate conference has produced no compromise on Gramm-Rudman. The Treasury again warns of bankruptcy and says it will have to draw money from Social Security trust funds. The House extends the Government's debt ceiling for a mere five days. Moreover, to show that House Democrats too are serious about deficit reduction, they pass their own proposal on spending cuts tied to economic growth. The bill is tossed back to the Senate, where it lands with a thud...
...Gramm-Rudman would permit Congress's previously agreed deficit limit for the current fiscal year, 1986, to increase from $172 billion to as much as $193 billion. Then it would require that the ceiling be lowered by roughly $36 billion each year until reaching zero by 1991, necessitating spending cuts in many social programs and much of the military budget...
...reform postponement was necessary to allow for a Senate-House conference on the disputed Gramm-Rudman amendment, a proposal designed to reduce the federal deficit to zero by 1991. The hastily drafted legislation, approved in the Senate by a 75-to-24 vote two weeks ago, calls for draconian spending cuts in many social programs and much of the military budget, and could transfer to the President a measure of Congress's power over federal appropriations. The amendment is attached to a bill to raise the Government's debt ceiling to more than $2 trillion. Without this increased borrowing power...
Both its critics and supporters concede that the Gramm-Rudman proposal is an act of desperation. But, say its advocates, these are desperate times. Congress has shown that it cannot cut the deficit without some radical new constraints on the way it writes budgets. The danger lies less in the rationale behind the plan than in the haste with which it was conceived. Even some of its most fervent public supporters privately hope that given the extra few days of deliberations, refinements can be added in the House-Senate conference committee to make the measure more flexible...