Word: gramm
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Reagan, on the other hand, sharply attacked the House Budget Committee resolution, which is supported by most Democrats. Cleverly devised by Oklahoma Democrat James Jones, chairman of the committee, it would cut the budget almost as sharply as the Gramm-Latta substitute. But it would provide more funds for many social programs. The lure for conservative Democrats is that Jones' proposal includes only a one-year tax cut and projects a much smaller budget deficit of $24.7 billion for 1982. Reagan, however, insisted that this plan was just "an echo of the past rather than a benchmark...
Confused? So are many of the Congressmen preparing to choose this week between the Administration-backed Gramm-Latta resolution and the opposing measure crafted by James Jones, the Oklahoma Democrat who heads the House Budget Committee. The root of the problem is that anyone attempting to gauge the effect of proposed spending and tax cuts has to make a stab at forecasting what inflation, unemployment and interest rates are likely to be. A one-point rise in the jobless rate, for example, adds $30 billion to the federal deficit by increasing expenditures for unemployment compensation, welfare and the like...
Thus, the Administration predicts-and the Gramm-Latta proposal assumes -7.2% inflation next year, an interest rate of 8.9% on short-term treasury bills, and a 7% unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of 1982. The Democrats' figures are 9.9% inflation, 12% interest and 7.4% unemployment...
Spending under Gramm-Latta, which cuts social programs and increases military outlays about as much as Reagan wants, would be $689 billion under the Administration's assumptions, $710 billion if the Democrats' numbers are believed. Outlays under the Jones measure, which gives more money to social programs and less to defense, would be either $692 billion or $713.6 billion...
...differences in deficit estimates are crucial, because they sway judgments on how big a tax cut the nation can afford. The Administration and backers of the Gramm-Latta resolution, which includes the first stage of Reagan's cherished proposal to slash income tax rates 30% over three years, predict a deficit of $31.4 billion in fiscal 1982. No, says Jones, the red-ink figure would be $42.6 billion-whereas, under the Democrats' proposal for a more modest tax cut, the deficit would be held to $24.7 billion...