Search Details

Word: griswold (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Ernest J. Brown has been named to the Langdell Professorship, vacated by former Law School Dean Erwin N. Griswold. Griswold is now Solicitor General of the United States...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Bok Picks Four For Law Chairs | 10/27/1969 | See Source »

Casner joined the Faculty of Law in 1938 and became associate dean of the school in 1961. When Erwin Griswold resigned as dean to become U.S. Solicitor General, Casner served as acting dean until the school appointed the present dean, Derek...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Lindsay, Reuther, Rockefeller, Udall Receive Honorary Degrees | 6/12/1969 | See Source »

...time of 4:33.0 in the mile run was only 41.9 seconds shy of the world record; Dunster's Stuart Herro, winner of the 60-yard hurdles; Eliot's Patrick Shipstead in the 440-yard run; Dudley's Bruce Jones in the 880-yard run; and Leverett's Doug Griswold in the shot...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Winthrop Takes 'B' Rowing Race; Eliot Captures House Track Meet | 5/14/1969 | See Source »

Eavesdropping Disclosure. In a brief statement concurring with the court, however, Justice Potter Stewart twitted Griswold and Government lawyers for having misunderstood the earlier holding in one important respect. All the court had done, said Stewart, was to require eavesdropping disclosure "where the surveillance violated the Fourth Amendment. We did not decide that any of the surveillances did violate the Fourth Amendment." Eavesdropping that is necessary to national security may well be legal, he said, and lower court judges may be free to decide that issue in chambers, without the defendant's participation. Thus, Stewart intimates, public disclosure...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: Misunderstanding About Bugs | 4/4/1969 | See Source »

Nonetheless, Griswold would probably be content to swallow the rebuke if he could be certain that the substance of Stewart's statement is supported by other members of the court. But Stewart, who generally gives greater weight to the claims of law enforcement than the other justices, was speaking solely for himself. And even he did not come out clearly for the inchamber proceeding. Thus the Government has no assurance that the court will hold that the issue of a bug's legality can be decided privately...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: Misunderstanding About Bugs | 4/4/1969 | See Source »

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next