Word: gsd
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...example, the first panel reserved its strongest criticism for the GSD professors whom the committee accused of failing to respond to calls for testimony, stating that "they must bear a major part of the responsibility for any inaccuracies or misinterpretations which might have been corrected by further discussion...
...Academic Policy Committee also concludes in its April 27 report that the limited cooperation of GSD officials did not constitute a denial of due process to Hartman. It cites three factors for this statement...
Hartman requested a review of his non-reappointment in June 1970. For the next two years procedural disputes delayed creation of a review committee. In mid-1972, over Hartman's objections, the GSD selected a five-remember investigatory panel of outside faculty...
...That since there was evidence of friction between Hartman and higher-ups in the planning department, the GSD and the University and since he had received "no satisfactory explanation of the decison [not to rehire] in terms of valid academic criteria," then it was a "fair inference that personal and political considerations violative of his rights had played a major role in the decision...
...senior faculty were aware and influenced by Hartman's stand on issues that they felt reflected Hartman's potential contribution to the department and to the GSD. These included not only teaching responsibilities and the role of the UFS but also Hartman's administrative behavior and personal relations with the faculty, which were marked, the panel says, by "continual friction...