Search Details

Word: gsd (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...procedures had stipulated that the appeal committee was to be selected from a list of 20 faculty members outside the GSD. The list was to have been selected from a previous list of June 1970, with a additions made by both Hartman and Kilbridge...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: GSD Review Scrapped After Hartman Appeal | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

Hartman said he will further respond to Rogers sometime this week. He added that Rogers told him to have a list of his nominees for the reformation of the review committee by February 23, and that the GSD faculty will select a new list of 20 at its March 3 meeting

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: GSD Review Scrapped After Hartman Appeal | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

...memorandum was just to Peter P. Rogers, associate professor of City Planning on January 11 by Chester W. Hartman '57 for presentation to the Graduate School of Design Faculty in anticipation of today's faculty meeting. The decision last week by Rogers and Maurice D. Killbridge, dean of the GSD, to begin Hartman's appeal proceeding again from scratch derived largely from Hartman's contentions in this memorandum, released to the Crimson by Hartman yesterday. Hartman, a former assistant professor of City Planning at the GSD, is currently on the faculty of design at the University of California at Berkeley...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Hartman, in Memorandum, Seeks a New Review | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

...know, the "Rogers Committee" has now found five persons willing to serve on the committee to hear my appeal to the GSD's decision not to renew my teaching contract. Under the procedures approved by the Faculty on May 14, 1971, I have the right to make one challenge to the membership of this committee. After due consideration of the nature of the committee's membership and the procedures by which the body was chosen, I have decided that I must challenge the committee on its entirety. I do this because two important violations of the procedures established by your...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Hartman, in Memorandum, Seeks a New Review | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

...have already informed you of my view that a procedure which calls for one of the parties in a disputed decision to nominate and elect a committee to hear an appeal to that decision is inherently unjust and based. The GSD Faculty certainly cannot be said to be impartial or indifferent in this matter. A substantial part of the Faculty was directly involved in the decision not to renew my contract; many if not most others have personal or political feelings about "the Hartman case;" and as a corporate body it would be unusual if you would not be relieved...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Hartman, in Memorandum, Seeks a New Review | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

Previous | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | Next