Search Details

Word: hards (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1890-1899
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...fitting time to consider the prospects for the year. It is of the utmost importance that the University shall assert once more its former superiority in debating. There are two defeats to be wiped out, and, in order to do it, and do it decisively, some very hard work will be required...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: No Headline | 10/12/1897 | See Source »

...their starting and oftentimes they were off before the ball was snapped. These faults may be remedied in time, but the running of the backs on Saturday was unmistakable evidence that there has got to be a rapid stride for the better, in their team play. Dibblee worked hard but failed to show up as creditably as he has in the previous games this year. On round the end plays, which have been his strong point, he was by no means a sure gainer, but in no single instance did the interference get well together. In this particular, Haughton especially...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: DARTMOUTH DEFEATED 13-0. | 10/11/1897 | See Source »

Harvard will play Dartmouth this afternoon at 3 o'clock, and a close hard fought game may be expected. Dartmouth has a heavy, experienced team, while this year's policy of development makes the real strength of the Harvard team hard to estimate...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: DARTMOUTH TODAY. | 10/9/1897 | See Source »

...finals in the intercollegiate tennis tournament were held this morning and were won by S. G. Thompson of Princeton who defeated J. D. Forbes of Harvard. A five set match was necessary to decide the championship. Forbes took the first set after a hard struggle, but easily succumbed in the next two. He took a strong brace in the fourth set and the last two sets were hotly contested, the result being in doubt until the last point was played...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: HARVARD LOSES TENNIS. | 10/9/1897 | See Source »

...Whitney's position as an independent reformer, so to speak, is a delicate one. In the first place there is no hard and fast rule for testing in all cases a man's amateur standing, and just where, in the intermediate territory between the professional and the amateur, the division line is to be drawn, is largely a matter of personal opinion. Certainly the best guide for Harvard men is the code of Harvard rules, while, as for the column in question, it can accomplish nothing without the support of public opinion, and next to nothing without the support...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: No Headline | 10/9/1897 | See Source »

Previous | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | Next