Search Details

Word: hartley (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...there is no progress, it seemed likely Eisenhower would move to stop the strike for 80 days anyway, by invoking emergency provisions of the Taft-Hartley...

Author: By The ASSOCIATED Press, | Title: Khrushchev Warns Communists To Resolve Questions Peacefully; Eisenhower Renews Steel Talks | 10/1/1959 | See Source »

...Jimmy Hoffa is ever crowbarred out of the driver's seat of the Teamsters Union, he need not fear for the future. Hoffa's predecessor, fat, easy-to-shove Dave Beck, faces trial on a charge of violating the Taft-Hartley Act and is sweating out appeals on convictions for income-tax evasion and grand larceny. But Seattle's Citizen Beck is too busy making money and enjoying life to worry too much about his problems...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: National Affairs: Citizen Beck | 9/28/1959 | See Source »

...convention, Secretary of Labor James Mitchell said that the Administration would have "no alternative" but to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act-and send the strikers back to work for 80 days-if the strike did not end soon. He also warned the steel companies that they were being very "shortsighted" in not finding a means to end the strike. If the Taft-Hartley Act was invoked, and there was no settlement during the 80-day period, Mitchell said that legislation "inimical" to the steel companies might well be passed by Congress...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Squeeze on the Nation | 9/28/1959 | See Source »

Prospects are that the strike will continue into October, when steel inventories will become exhausted and the economy will be hard hit by the strike. If this happens, Secretary of Labor James Mitchell said he would recommend that the President invoke the Taft-Hartley Law. Such action would send the Steelworkers back to work for about 80 days, give a fact-finding board time to study the issues and try to persuade both sides to settle. If no settlement is reached during the 80-day cooling off period then the strike would resume...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Good Faith Is Required | 9/21/1959 | See Source »

...union has repeatedly asked that Taft-Hartley not be used, arguing that it would bail out the steel companies, which could resume production just when the pressure (from shortages) to settle is greatest. In 80 days they could build up production enough to satisfy some industry needs and face another strike. But there is a growing feeling among rank-and-filers that, Taft-Hartley or no, the union is already licked and will have to settle on the industry's terms...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Good Faith Is Required | 9/21/1959 | See Source »

Previous | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | Next