Search Details

Word: hartmans (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Hartman charges that his contract termination was prompted by personal and political considerations. Active here in what some would call the New Left of planning, he was vocal in his negative views of the University's plans for the surrounding community. He suspects that those views, and not any question of professional expertise, were behind his dismissal...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: An Assistant Professor's Appeal Drags On at the Design School | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...procedures to govern the appeal process, and established the Rogers Committee to oversee the implementation of those procedures. But after several months, the procedures proved unworkable. The first of many delays in the appeal process began as the Rogers Motion was reworked into ad hoc procedures designed expressly for Hartman's appeal...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: An Assistant Professor's Appeal Drags On at the Design School | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...procedures were instituted, and Peter P. Rogers, associate professor of City Planning, began attempting to persuade five professors from outside the GSD to serve on the appeal committee. Rogers eventually succeeded in filling the committee in January 1972, but Hartman promptly challenged it in its entirety...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: An Assistant Professor's Appeal Drags On at the Design School | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

...Hartman charged that two of his rights under the ad hoc procedures had been violated in the committee's selection. In February, Rogers admitted that Hartman's challenge had been correct, and announced that the Rogers Committee would again attempt to form a committee following the ad hoc procedures. Hartman was "pleased" that the GSD recognized its errors, but expressed dismay that "they plan to go through the same drawn out process again...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: An Assistant Professor's Appeal Drags On at the Design School | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

Throughout the entire proceeding, Hartman had consistently maintained that the ad hoc procedures were basically unfair, a condition he said explained why the Rogers Committee was finding it difficult to get faculty members to serve on the appeal committee. He continually called for new appeal procedures, claiming that it was unfair for one party to the dispute--the GSD--to choose the appeal committee. He wanted a neutral body to select the committee and coordinate its procedures...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: An Assistant Professor's Appeal Drags On at the Design School | 6/15/1972 | See Source »

Previous | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | Next