Search Details

Word: hartmans (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Academic Policy Committee, which completed its 32-page report in late April and is now circulating it confidentially to principals in the case, rejects Hartman's assertion that his academic freedom was violated and concludes that the Department of City and Regional Planning had "sufficient legitimate grounds" for not renewing the outspoken junior faculty member's appointment...

Author: By Charles E. Shepard, | Title: GSD Panel Rejects 'Remedial Action' For Former Faculty Member Hartman | 5/10/1976 | See Source »

...faculty will consider the panel's recommendations in a special meeting May 26, seven months after it asked the five-member policy panel to review the just-released 300-page report of an ad hoc University committee that has studied Hartman's charges for over three years...

Author: By Charles E. Shepard, | Title: GSD Panel Rejects 'Remedial Action' For Former Faculty Member Hartman | 5/10/1976 | See Source »

...report of this University panel--known as the Hartman Review Committee--represented Harvard's first attempt to systematically study a non-hiring case. It examined a junior faculty member's right to criticize his tenured colleagues, the role of "subjective" elements in hiring decisions, and the obligations of a department to grant "due process" to those it considers for non-tenured positions...

Author: By Charles E. Shepard, | Title: GSD Panel Rejects 'Remedial Action' For Former Faculty Member Hartman | 5/10/1976 | See Source »

While the first review committee reported that it was "not prepared to assert" that Hartman's academic freedom had been abridged, it also found that Hartman had "legitimate" procedural and substantive grievances...

Author: By Charles E. Shepard, | Title: GSD Panel Rejects 'Remedial Action' For Former Faculty Member Hartman | 5/10/1976 | See Source »

...review committee criticized several administrators and faculty involved in the 1969 decision not to rehire Hartman. Its report detailed the school's reliance on "grossly inadequate" and "execrable" procedures for considering reappointments, incompetence in the Department, a "failure of administrative oversight," "the intrusion of subjective elements" into the GSD decision, and a "troublesome" role played in the non-reappointment by then-President Nathan M. Pusey...

Author: By Charles E. Shepard, | Title: GSD Panel Rejects 'Remedial Action' For Former Faculty Member Hartman | 5/10/1976 | See Source »

Previous | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | Next