Word: header
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...total control of himself, in control of his pitches. He’s a bulldog.”With the victories, Harvard rose to 7-3 in the Ivy League, remaining tied with Brown, which blew out Dartmouth over the weekend. Harvard faces Brown in a double-header showdown that could decide the Rolfe title next weekend in Providence. “I’m not too happy with .500, but I think we’re starting to play some good baseball,” Walsh said. “And anytime Harvard can take two from Yale...
...positive impact on the team this year,” Watkins said. “The team chemistry has really been affected positively by their presence.” The games against Yale were originally scheduled to start on Saturday and continue on Sunday, but instead the first double-header will be played today at 3:15 and 5:15, while the second set of two games is tomorrow. All games are at Dewitt Family Field in New Haven...
After dropping its final two games of the weekend, Harvard (15-11) rebounded yesterday, looking strong in taking both games of its double header with Holy Cross (2-27). The Crimson pitching staff of junior Shelley Madick and freshman Dana Roberts dominated the Crusaders giving up zero runs in twelve innings of work. Backing its pitchers, the Harvard bats exploded for 15 runs on 18 hits. “It feels good that we are loose and that we are capable of putting things together,” coach Jenny Allard said. HARVARD 12, HOLY CROSS 0 As her teammates...
...Harvard softball team wrapped up interdivisional play the same way it began it last week: sweeping its firstdouble header and getting swept in the second.The Crimson took two from host and two-time defending league champion Princeton on Saturday, 5-2 and 3-1. But the next day, it was on the wrong end of the sweep, as it fell to Cornell, 9-8 and 6-4. The games were played in Providence because of a snowstorm in Ithaca.Despite Sunday’s sweep, Harvard is still in good shape as it enters divisional play. The Crimson...
...March 18. But that forecast had to be hastily revised last week, when officials discovered that a computer glitch had thrown off the prediction. As programming errors go, this was just slightly less catastrophic than the NASA mistake that caused the $125 million Mars Climate Orbiter to take a header into the Red Planet in 1999. Chastened officials apologized on national TV, and changed the forecast to March...