Search Details

Word: herrnsteins (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...undersigned members of Adams House, want to make the following points about Mr. Herrnstein's article, "I.Q." in the Atlantic, and the issues it has raised...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: WHO NEEDS I.Q.? | 1/24/1972 | See Source »

...crucial sections of Mr. Herrnstein's article are to be found in the introduction by the editors and in Mr. Herrnstein's conclusion. These sections deal not with science but with political and social theory. As such Mr. Herrnstein has opened his article up to political as well as scholarly criticism. The faculty statement in the Crimson unfortunately missed this crucial point...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: WHO NEEDS I.Q.? | 1/24/1972 | See Source »

...Towards the end of his article, Mr. Herrnstein states. "By removing arbitrary barriers between classes, society has encouraged the creation of biological barriers." We disagree with this position as it is applied to America. Working people in America are confronted with an educational system that provides serious education only to the wealthy; an army that drafts primarily the poor; a medical establishment that gives the wealthy the best health care in the world, while giving the poor treatment inferior to that in many industrial countries; a housing policy which permits the rich to escape to the suburbs, while forcing...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: WHO NEEDS I.Q.? | 1/24/1972 | See Source »

...tone of implicit moral superiority in your letter. I do not believe, and you have not proved, that free and honest discussion of human differences will promote racial injustice or retard its termination. And that, whether you recognize it or not, is actually the issue between us. R.J. Herrnstein...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: The Musgrave-Herrnstein Letters | 1/20/1972 | See Source »

Dear Professor Herrnstein...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: The Musgrave-Herrnstein Letters | 1/20/1972 | See Source »

Previous | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | Next