Search Details

Word: hoechst (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1980-1989
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

After appearing at the NIH gathering and a subsequent set of hearings before the Science and Technology Committee, Lamont-Havers expresses impatience with "many deliberate misconceptions" associated with the Hoechst agreement and adds that "of course everything will be published as if there was no industrial money involved--we are still scientists first." Referring specifically to the House hearings, he says that "like anyone else, Congressmen are interested in gaining publicity when an important event occurs. That was their main motivation." After grilling Lamont-Havers, one committee member, Rep. Albert Gore (D. Tenn.) emerged from the conference room to tell...

Author: By Paul M. Barrett, | Title: Biotechnology and the Faustian Dilemma | 7/3/1981 | See Source »

Thus, eager to keep up with the latest discoveries made in university labs and, in the long run, hopeful that basic research will lead to marketable products. Du Pont, Hoechst, and other companies have readily supplied cash for projects that in the past have been backed primarily by federal agencies. Large research universities like Harvard have openly sought these new sources of income, arguing, as President Bok did in his annual report this year, that with extreme vigilance, academic values will not be threatened by the new corporate connections...

Author: By Paul M. Barrett, | Title: Biotechnology and the Faustian Dilemma | 7/3/1981 | See Source »

...recent gathering of the NIH advisory committee, Donald Fredrickson, director of that agency, questioned an official from Massachusetts General about whether the quality and independence of the hospital's research would be compromised by industrial support. Ronald Lamont-Havers, director of research at the facility, defended the Hoechst agreement as specifically designed to preserve academic integrity, adding that similar fears were raised 30 years ago about increasing federal funding for campus research. He noted in a recent interview that without the government, which today supports 75 per cent of the nation's biomedical research universities would "never have achieved anything...

Author: By Paul M. Barrett, | Title: Biotechnology and the Faustian Dilemma | 7/3/1981 | See Source »

Lamont-Havers contends that a corporation will not necessarily begin dictating research policy to a university or hospital just because it helps support work going on there. He told the NIH that Hoechst's main interests are to obtain up-to-date information and have a place to train its best young scientists. Alan C. Olsson, dean for resources at the Med School and one of the masterminds behind the Du Pont deal, agrees emphatically, saying that although Du Pont has not requested training positions for its people, the company's main interest "is forwarding investigations that will lead...

Author: By Paul M. Barrett, | Title: Biotechnology and the Faustian Dilemma | 7/3/1981 | See Source »

Under the Du Pont and Hoechst agreements, the grant recipient still retains the patents for discoveries made with corporate funds, but the companies are given exclusive licenses to develop and market any products that result. One concern described in an interview by Doris Merritt, a research and training resources officer at NIH, is that private benefactors will pressure scientists to hold off on patenting their innovations--keeping them secret--until the discoveries "are fine-tuned and ready to be sold." In what has become a widely quoted warning, Merritt told the NIH conference. "Publish or perish doesn't need...

Author: By Paul M. Barrett, | Title: Biotechnology and the Faustian Dilemma | 7/3/1981 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Next