Search Details

Word: huc (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...HUC, the HPC, and SFAC have all suggested that some measures be taken against ROTC as it is now constituted at Harvard. Their suggestions are premised on a liberal assumption: the university is "a neutral haven" for scholarship, in which all points of view are objectively examined. In this community of scholars, all pursuing a "liberal education," the military has no place; what one learns in ROTC courses is of inferior intellectual quality and involves a technical training rather than an academic discipline...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: SDS Position Papers: Why ROTC 'Must GO' | 2/3/1969 | See Source »

Therefore, the HPC, the HUC, and SFAC seek merely to remove accreditation from ROTC. As the HPC statements says: "Our report is not meant to challenge the existence of ROTC at Harvard, but rather to challenge certain inappropriate aspects of its present status (CRIMSON, 11/15/68). Similarly, the HUC in its statement says: "ROTC could regain all of these privileges by applying for them in the same manner as other Harvard organizations must. . . . These positions, then, in no way challenge the function of ROTC, only its academic status...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: SDS Position Papers: Why ROTC 'Must GO' | 2/3/1969 | See Source »

...assumption on which the HUC, the HPC, and SFAC base their positions is that the university is a neutral institution engaged in value-free research, In fact, Harvard is intimately linked with U.S. imperialism and the oppression of people at home and abroad. Harvard is a corporation; it has business interests, for instance, in the power companies of the American South (companies which follow racist hiring policies) it is a landlord in Cambridge and its effect on the community had been to drive up rents and dispossess working people (at an enormous profit). Harvard allows military recruiters free...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: SDS Position Papers: Why ROTC 'Must GO' | 2/3/1969 | See Source »

...keep ROTC on those campuses. Dean Glimp in fact told the faculty that the Pentagon was willing to be "flexible" about course credit; that they realized the potential of student unrest and were willing to make concessions to forestall it. In the context of this "flexibility," the SFAC-HUC-HPC resolutions, regardless of intent, would have the objective effect of keeping ROTC here: "In my considered judgment, the withdrawal of academic credit for Army ROTC courses at Harvard would not, of itself, cause the Department of the Army to withdraw the ROTC unit from Harvard" (memorandum...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: SDS Position Papers: Why ROTC 'Must GO' | 2/3/1969 | See Source »

Lance E. Lindblom '70, an HUC member, disagreed. The symposium's purpose had been to suggest a redistribution of power in favor of students to handle issues such as ROTC on which the Faculty and students fundamentally disagree, Lindblom said. He suggested parallel committees topped by a student senate elected at large with proportional representation. The senate's decisions should be final unless overruled by a two-thirds Faculty vote, according to Lindblom...

Author: By Peter D. Kramer, | Title: Student-Faculty Symposium Avoids Proposal for Student Government | 2/3/1969 | See Source »

Previous | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next