Search Details

Word: incorrectness (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1950-1959
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...therefore, is both incorrect and improper to simply conclude, as your editorial did that be [Lubell] and peed for the privilege against self-incrimination...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Lubell's Letter | 10/15/1953 | See Source »

Finally, I would like to point out that "Immunizing the Lubells" is an incorrect title for your editorial. Since "immunize" means 'to protect' you certainly do not propose the immunizing of may brother and me since by your so-called reasoning we are already 'diseased'. But it must be the Law School and the legal profession that is to be protected. It is hard to believe that the editors of the CRIMSON have taken such a position for they must know that the vigor of our democracy stems from and depends on the American people having a opportunity to examine...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Lubell's Letter | 10/15/1953 | See Source »

...prove the Daily generality incorrect, Allen distributed polls to fellow graduates of Princeton who were also exiled in Cambridge graduate schools. He asked their opinions on eight topics, beginning with the worthwhileness of the honor system through to whether a similar system could be made to work at Harvard...

Author: By Arthur J. Langguth, | Title: Princetonians Laud Honor System, Question Harvard Adoption of Plan | 10/8/1953 | See Source »

Conscience compels me to voice disagreement with your editorial attempt to justify the Law Review action in refusing to extend a membership invitation to an eligible. The tonor of your article indicates a certain insularity from fact, a propensity to reach ostensibly satisfactory conclusions from incorrect propositions...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: The Mail Box | 10/1/1953 | See Source »

...state will spend 36% of its new budget on consumers (education, health, culture), he said, and by some Marxist magic which he did not elaborate, they actually would get back 127 billion rubles "more than they will contribute to it." He denounced the previous "incorrect attitude" towards the poor collective farmer, whose "private auxiliary farmstead" had been heavily taxed, and his private cows taken from him. All this would be changed...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: RUSSIA: The Man in Charge | 8/17/1953 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | Next