Search Details

Word: indianas (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1920-1929
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Meanwhile, back and forth through the white front door in S Street, passed many people-friends bearing advice, advisers looking for friendship-Indiana's Watson, long of leg and small of eye; Mellon the benign; square-jawed Borah and mouse-grey Good, North Dakota's boyish Nye, Iowa's heavy-footed Brookhart. They talked of many things to the Next President and went away holding their tongues...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: National Affairs: Midge | 3/4/1929 | See Source »

Goals from field--Colestock 7, C. Miller 3, Bernet 2, H. Bauer, Allen, J. Bauer, Farren, Farrell 4, Burns 3, Mahady 3, Wenner 3, Rex. Fouls--Colestock 6, E. Miller 3, Allen, Farren, Wenner 6, Burns 3, Upton, Farrell, Mahady. Referee--Day (Indiana). Umpire--Pippen (Maryland). Time--Two 20 minute periods...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: CRIMSON DEFEATED BY NAVY BASKETBALL TEAM | 2/25/1929 | See Source »

...Roebuck & Co. came out for Mr. Rockefeller Jr. with the statement: "It was fitting for stockholders in any enterprise to see that the business is managed by officers whom they can trust." But Philanthropist Rosenwald's influence was moral, not financial. He owns no stock in Standard Oil of Indiana...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Rockefeller v. Stewart | 2/18/1929 | See Source »

Round 18. As a member of the Rockefeller proxy committee, Winthrop Williams Aldrich announced that he and his colleagues held proxies for 51% of the stock of Standard Oil of Indiana, or enough to enable Mr. Rockefeller Jr. to win the fight and oust Col. Stewart. Mr Aldrich is a son of the late Senator Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich (oldtime friend and intimate of Mr. Rockefeller Sr.) . . . the younger Aldrich now attacks for his impregnable brother...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Rockefeller v. Stewart | 2/18/1929 | See Source »

...true that Col. Stewart claimed the support of a majority of Standard Oil of Indiana stockholders. But it is also true that the application of Mr. Hogan's reasoning would cause all U. S. business to totter, to go into a panic. It would mean that, in any corporation, the holder of one share would be as powerful as the holder of 10,000 shares...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Rockefeller v. Stewart | 2/18/1929 | See Source »

Previous | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next