Search Details

Word: indictments (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...could indict Lewinsky for perjury in the Paula Jones case. "He wouldn't get much public sympathy," says Novak, "and legal experts believe a D.C. jury won't be impressed...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: How To Solve a Problem Like Monica | 5/1/1998 | See Source »

...sealed decision leaked to reporters Thursday, Chief U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson ruled the written suggestion -- immunity from prosecution in exchange for testimony -- was not actually a binding agreement. That leaves Starr free to make his next move: Either call Lewinsky before the grand jury, or simply indict her for perjury...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Lewinsky Deal Declared Dead | 4/30/1998 | See Source »

...asks the clerk who picked up the phone at an independent Manhattan bookstore specializing in art and photo books. She is responding to my queries about David Hamilton, the photographer whose recent collection of images of nude young girls, The Age of Innocence, prompted an Alabama grand jury to indict Barnes & Noble on charges of selling child pornography. This action came in response to protests by Christian activists, fanned nationwide by the likes of Randall Terry, the antiabortion activist and conservative talk-show host. It won't surprise you to learn that the opinion of Barnes & Noble, the largest...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Beyond The Pale | 3/16/1998 | See Source »

Starr is seeking to build a case involving perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice. He is not seeking to indict the President for adultery or sexual misconduct. Yet the media and the public seem unable to understand this. What is so complicated? HENRY S. KRAMER Wharton...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Mar. 16, 1998 | 3/16/1998 | See Source »

...soon as he's off stage, the White House strategy of making him the issue loses steam. And since legal experts are divided on whether a sitting President can be charged with a crime--like most of them, Starr leans toward no--he's also not expected to indict Clinton himself, even if he does decide he has sufficient evidence to charge the President with perjury or obstruction of justice. Instead Starr is likely to hand off the whole mess to the House Judiciary Committee, where its 35 members would have to decide if what Starr gives them amounts...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Turning Up The Heat | 2/23/1998 | See Source »

Previous | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next