Word: interpretational
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...passed by Congress and signed into law, the legislation could allow the government to interpret any number of acts as indications that a citizen wants to end his or her citizenship, according to Cohen...
...interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place” (Federalist 51). On the other hand, the judiciary is different, and that is why article III of the Constitution provides for judges to enjoy good behavior tenure. Not only are they expected to interpret the law, not make it, but they must “unite the requisite integrity with the requisite knowledge” so as to be able to deal with complex cases and numerous precedents thoughtfully and fairly (Federalist...
...does not possess the high qualifications for federal judicial office. Mr. Estrada’s record in the Solicitor General’s Office suggests that he is no ideologue. When high ability and good character are both present in a judicial appointment, the differences in the way judges interpret the law are likely to be reasonable and defensible. When a Democrat next wins the Presidency, let him, or her, follow the same high standard for judicial appointments that President Bush has with this nomination...
...that anyone had ever obtained. She discovered and photographed the hydrated B form of DNA, and she established, crucially, that DNA's structure depended on an external backbone, with the bases on the inside. But here the stories diverge. According to The Double Helix, Franklin was unable to interpret her images properly and was unwilling to share them with others, to a point where Watson and Crick were forced to go around her to get at her data. According to Maddox, however, Franklin was perfectly capable of interpreting the X-ray images, although she was slow to come around...
Many South Koreans, however, are less concerned with the North’s nukes than with the latest James Bond movie, which many South Koreans say misrepresents North Korea as overly hostile. But how else are we supposed to interpret threats to turn America into a “sea of fire?” My apologies if Americans don’t see the softer side of Stalinism...