Word: investers
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Their growth prospects evaporated largely because many industries became increasingly outmoded and continued to lose their edge in global competition. America was living off its accumulated capital stock, a consequence of its people's unwillingness or inability to save and invest. While the U.S. spent scarcely 10% of its national income on new factories, mines, tools and transportation systems, its allies and competitors the West Germans and the Japanese were investing 15% and 16.2%, respectively, of their incomes in such capital goods. One result: U.S. productivity, which had risen an average 3% a year in the 1960s, declined...
...much as $34 billion by the end of the 1980s. The fund makes major loans to other provinces (at competitive rates), but its main purpose is to bankroll Alberta's economic future. The provincial government has acquired its own Pacific Western Airlines; set up a local company to invest in all forms of energy, including oil from the thick, gummy tar sands; and offers fat incentives to new firms willing to open up in smaller communities...
...want to be a Pewter Pot." He doesn't want to accept orders from the manager of a chain, and he doesn't want the government to take charge of his business, either. "You work hard-hard and you get your money and you got to invest it, man! It's yours...
...these defects, Long and Ullman argue that the VAT could break America's inflationary spiral by providing the necessary incentives to boost productivity. Americans save a smaller portion of their incomes than citizens of any other western nation. With savings, so low, banks and business have limited funds to invest in expanding capital to spur productivity. The solution to this problem--for Senator Long and Representative Ullman--lies in a tax on consumption. They even propose that this consumption tax--the VAT--partially replaces the corporate profits tax to free still more money for investment. Evidently, Long and Ullman have...
...adjusting the progressive income tax to create incentives for savings. Instead of simply taxing income, the Federal government could tax income minus savings in a way that equalizes the tax burdens upon the rich and poor. With these incentives, Americans would certainly save more, banks and business would invest more, and ensuing gains in productivity would steadily combat inflation...