Word: jointly
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1890-1899
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...view of the coming joint debate between Harvard and Yale, I wish to say a word in regard to the suggestion that no decision be made as to the merits of the speakers. While it is difficult in many ways to do this, it seems to me that unless it is done a great part of the interest will be taken away. Why not invite one of Yale's Faculty to come on with their representatives, to act as judge with a Harvard professor, and a third man chosen by these two? This would make a fair committee, and would...
...author of the communication in another column seems to us to miss the real point of the proposed joint debate between Harvard and Yale. It is not necessary in a debate that there be a formal decision in order to get all the advantages of a decision. A formal decision would really settle nothing. Every listener must inevitably decide in his own mind as to the merits, of the debaters and no ruling of judges could affect that decision. A formal decision could only add an unpleasant feature to the joint debate wishout bringing any distinct gain. Even what emphasis...
...Harvard Union proposes this year to hold two joint debates with Yale. This is the first time in the history of the Union that such a thing has been tried, but the undertaking ought to prove successful. The Yale Union challenged and Harvard accepted. J. M. Perkins '91 and R. C. Surbridge, L. S., representing Harvard, and R. R. Upton '92 and W. B. Bailey '94 representing Yale, met at Cooley's Hotel, Springfield, last Saturday. It was decided to hold two joint debates, the first to take place Thursday, Jan 14, at Sanders Theatre, the second in April...
Seminary in American History and Political Economy. Joint meeting. Periodical Literature and Collections. Professor Taussig. University...
Seminary in American History and Political Economy. Joint meeting. Periodical Literature and Collections. Professor Taussig. University...