Search Details

Word: kinnocks (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...anti-Biden tapes to The New York Times, The DesMoines Register, and the NBC Nightly News by John Sasso, present one of two views of the former Dukakis campaign manager's actions. Either Sasso was right to have made an issue out of Biden's appropriation of a Neil Kinnock speech or he was wrong...

Author: By David J. Barron, | Title: A Question of Right and Wrong | 10/14/1987 | See Source »

...requires discussion between candidates. The public then decides who has been more convincing. The candidate who is challenged has the opportunity to respond at a level of seriousness to the issues put forth by his rival. If Dukakis charges Biden with being disingenuos, Biden can counter by explaining why Kinnock and the Kennedys hold such a sway over him. But the press justifies revelations, such as those pertaining to Biden, by invoking the right of scrutiny which is by design not a dialogue, but rather an examination...

Author: By David J. Barron, | Title: A Question of Right and Wrong | 10/14/1987 | See Source »

...Biden and his aides make statements of fact in refutation, such as the claim that attribution to Kinnock was originally intended. The press then applies scrutiny to these claims of fact. Each fact which the press refutes thus damages the candidate's credibility...

Author: By David J. Barron, | Title: A Question of Right and Wrong | 10/14/1987 | See Source »

...Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's Conservatives. With an eye toward broadening party appeal, Labor promised to reassess even such sacred party tenets as state ownership of industry and unilateral nuclear disarmament, which Deputy Party Leader Roy Hattersley called the "major vote loser" in the past election. Party Leader Neil Kinnock said, "We have got to appeal to the voters we need...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Britain: Champagne Socialism? | 10/12/1987 | See Source »

...Kinnock denied that Labor would "jettison our commitments" or that the party was "retreating or pandering to yuppies." Instead, he argued that the new tilt was a concession to "social realities." When a worker earns $600 a week, owns his own house, car and a vacation retreat in Spain, the party leader declared, "you do not say, 'Let me take you out of your misery, brother...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Britain: Champagne Socialism? | 10/12/1987 | See Source »

Previous | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Next