Word: lacaria
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Christopher Lacaria is welcome to his opinion (“The Apotheosis of Dr. Faust,” column, Feb. 11) about the selection of Harvard’s new president. But casting aspersions on President-elect Faust’s stunning record of historical scholarship on the Civil War, slave owners, and the political economy of Southern plantation agriculture is a strange response from a student of history at Harvard College. In particular, his derisive citing of Faust’s essay analyzing the impact of the exaggerated scale of deaths during the Civil War?...
...Modernity and Its Discontents": Christopher B. Lacaria ’09 is a history concentrator in Mather House and the publisher of the Harvard Salient. He will provide a critical look at the absurdities and inanities of the post-modern academy here at Harvard in his column, which will run on alternate Mondays. "Hub Happenings": Stephen C. Bartenstein ’08 is a government concentrator in Lowell House and a proud Lexington, Mass. native. His column will provide mischievously mordant commentary on Bay State life as it relates to the Harvard scholar. On alternate Mondays, Stephen will opine...
Christopher B. Lacaria ’09 is a history concentrator in Mather House. His column appears on alternate Mondays...
...wanted was for Christopher B. Lacaria ’09, who is also a Crimson editorial editor, and Justin S. Murray ’07 to reveal the sentiment that lies behind a statement like, “Gays are free to marry anyone, as long as that person is of the opposite sex” (one of Lacaria’s gems). And, likewise, for Eva Z. Lam ’10 and Katherine E. Smith ’10 to stop citing studies about two males’ rearing prowess and argue why those two men?...
...Love should be the basis for marriage,” Lam said, noting that over 600,000 same-sex couples in America cannot legalize their commitments. “It should be about the private and personal decisions of individuals, not the government definition.” Christopher B. Lacaria ’09, a staff writer for the Salient, responded with a defense of the institutional definition of marriage. “If you redefine marriage, there will be disastrous consequences,” Lacaria said. “It stops being a fundamental social institution and becomes sexual...