Search Details

Word: lear (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...faith lost there is now restored. Peter Brook's King Lear is not quite an unconditional success, but it is close enough. With a minimum of gimmickry and self-consciousness, Shakespeare is transcribed to film, not just filmed theatre, and the play's gain far exceeds its loss. There are sequences on the screen that could not begin to be conceived on stage; a few are embarassing, most work...

Author: By Michael Levenson, | Title: King Lear | 12/2/1971 | See Source »

...senses a certain unwieldiness to the text and without hesitation cuts whatever he considers to be excess. Shakespeare's introductory scene between the Earls of Gloucester and Kent is eliminated; the film begins immediately with the parcelling of the kingdom among the three daughters. The first words are Lear's "Know we have divided-in three our kingdom...", Brook thrusting us into crisis at once. Within five minutes Cordelia has already refused to publicly acclaim her love for her father. Lear has disowned her, and the central dramatic movement...

Author: By Michael Levenson, | Title: King Lear | 12/2/1971 | See Source »

...that is the drift of the directing throughout. Brook is impatient with peripheral events and dispenses with them as often as possible. He uses explanatory titles to speed up the action and cuts scenes mercilessly. It is toward the great events that his imagination tends--Lear raging at Cordelia or mad in the storm on the heath or overwhelmed with regret before his death--and on these scenes Brook lavishes his attention lovingly. To the Gloucester subplot he is for the most part cursory. He reserves his ingenuity for Lear alone. And as Lear, Paul Scofield carries the film...

Author: By Michael Levenson, | Title: King Lear | 12/2/1971 | See Source »

Scofield's Lear succeeded in obliterating the Lear of my mind's eye. My Lear was lean and withered; Scofield's is a Lear of physical bulk and substance, a tragic counterpart to Orson Welles' Falstaff, completely convincing--I can no longer imagine it otherwise. Scofield contains the tragedy. He is not tossed about by adversity; he swallows adversity and swells to bursting...

Author: By Michael Levenson, | Title: King Lear | 12/2/1971 | See Source »

...ultimate failure of the film is too serious for the good things in it to redeem. It is unthinkable that at some moment the destiny of Lear would not move one to tears. That moment never comes in this film...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Cinema: King Blear | 11/29/1971 | See Source »

Previous | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | Next