Word: legalizes
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1940-1949
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...offered what he called "important concessions." They had been formulated by himself and T. V. Soong, Acting President of the Executive Yuan and the Central Government's crack trouble shooter. To meet Yenan's demand for a democratic coalition government, Chungking was ready to give the Communists legal status and minority posts in the National Defense Council and Executive Yuan. To meet Yenan's demand for an all-party constitutional convention, Chungking offered to convoke an all-party meeting to consider "military and political unification pending a national congress." But when Chungking asked Yenan...
...Cairo conference succeeded, it would put into effect the Alexandria resolution for unified educational, financial, commercial, legal and foreign policies by all Arab nations. It would change the balance of power in the Middle East, might affect Britain, France, Russia, the U.S. But there were difficult, immediate problems...
Judge Feinberg's ruling established the first U.S. precedent in a curious legal problem. The first reported case of human artificial insemination occurred in England in 1790, when Dr. John Hunter, consulted by a "linen draper in the Strand" suffering from a deformity of the urethra, decided to inject the draper's wife with semen by means of a syringe. The operation produced a normal pregnancy. Since then moralists have viewed the process with increasing alarm, while visionary eugenists have hailed the prospects (e.g., the indefinite perpetuation of great men through preservation of their frozen semen for generation...
Britain's only legal precedent (Russell v. Russell) holds that "fecundation ab extra" is adulterous. But there has been no British legislation on the subject. As the American Medical Association's legal department recently observed: Society has formed no opinion and enacted no law regarding artificial insemination...
...Department could revoke its approval of an agreement, any time it wanted. But U.S. corporations and businessmen would no longer be harried by antitrust laws, as they sometimes are now: they could not be indicted, under any "new" interpretation of the antitrust laws, for something they thought was perfectly legal at the time they...