Word: loseing
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...League Championship Series—the Crimson has a great amount of all-around talent. This year, the players are not willing to settle for second-best like they had to last season. They are ready to go all the way and reclaim their title.“To lose to [Princeton] in the Ivy championship was just heartbreaking,” co-captain Bailey Vertovez says. “Coming out, our opening Ivy games are Cornell and Princeton, at home this time. We’re going to be out for revenge in [the Princeton] game, definitely...
...avenge last season’s disappointing loss to Princeton in the league championship series.“Obviously, every year we want to win the Ivy title, so we’ve gone [into the season] thinking that,” Vertovez says. “To lose to [Princeton] in the Ivy championship was just heartbreaking.” The captains will have to find a way to guide their team to the Ivy championship this year without all of the luxuries that come with a large senior class—players used to the rigors...
...resources and time, even in better financial times.“Even if we had all the money in the world, these are things that take serious amounts of time,” Greenblatt says.For large-scale projects, Greenblatt says, it is important to keep discussion moving and not lose sight of long-term goals.“It’s very easy to lose track,” Greenblatt says. “And I’m encouraged by the fact that the University has stepped...
...diaster. Even without the Auschwitz allegations, the foundations of the Schaeffler industrial empire have been shaken. With the German government (and Germany's taxpayers) refusing to bail her out, Maria-Elisabeth Schaeffler will have to give up a significant stake in the company to pay off creditors and could lose control of the family business. She has gambled high before and - defying the odds - won. She once said in a rare interview, "You don't get anywhere in this world by being nice to everyone." No one is being nice...
...that his position on Afghanistan will be the same as it was on Iraq - in favor of more troops. Obama could easily find himself in the same sort of hawk-vs.-dove debate that has boggled American Presidents from Vietnam to Iraq. Traditionally, Presidents favor more troops - and precipitously lose public support. In this case, Obama's margin for error is minuscule, given the enormity of the economic crisis. He simply can't get bogged down in Afghanistan. And he simply can't allow al-Qaeda and the Taliban free rein. And every option in between seems either a gamble...