Search Details

Word: mantras (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 2000-2009
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...tolerance” is a dicey word. It gets repeated like a mantra in these parts. Its syllables merge into the murky, hypnotic murmur of PC-speak that might be called the soundtrack to Harvard life. Tolerance is a generous word, not particularly demanding on those who use it, because it leaves lots of room for uninterrogated prejudice under a brittle veneer of civility. Tolerance accommodates statements like, “I have no problem with gay people, I just don’t see why they have to be so in-your-face about...

Author: By Marcel A.Q. Laflamme, | Title: Kissing (In)Tolerance Goodbye | 4/24/2003 | See Source »

...quite "Who lost China?" - the mantra of Joe McCarthy's witch-hunt that began a purge of the State Department - but Newt Gingrich's attack on Foggy Bottom certainly matches McCarthy for hysteria. Indeed, if the (dare we say "disgraced"?) former Speaker of the House is to be believed, President Bush's foreign policy is being systematically sabotaged by a determined group of fanatics in the very department charged with carrying it out. The evidence? Quite simply that most of the world opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq; that no UN Security Council resolution could be garnered to authorize...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: In Defense of State | 4/23/2003 | See Source »

...even new members pick up this mantra quickly...

Author: By Faryl Ury, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Music Preview | 4/18/2003 | See Source »

...best you have to beat the best,” says Donovan in explaining Walsh’s mantra...

Author: By Lisa Kennelly, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: IMPROPER BOSTONIAN: Irrepressible Walsh Coaches Harvard His Way | 4/10/2003 | See Source »

Last week the President answered with the Administration's deliberately opaque mantra: "We will remain in Iraq as long as necessary and not a day more." How long that is depends on tough decisions yet to be made about the U.S. role. Should Washington be more concerned with ensuring stability or with avoiding the impression of occupation? Should the U.S. set up basic political structures and clear out or take a longer time to try to build a civil society? Under all schemes, a full complement of U.S. troops--anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000--would form the central...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Looking Beyond Saddam | 3/10/2003 | See Source »

Previous | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | Next