Word: matthew
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1900-1909
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...vice-president--H. S. Blair '08, O. L. M. H. Lyding '09, H. B. Squires 1L.; for secretary-treasurer, S. P. Peavey, Jr., 1L.; for directors, from the Graduate Schools--C. B. Ames 2Dv., A. B. Church 1L., R. R. Colby sL., G. H. Cutter 2L., A. P. Matthew 2L., M. A. Norton '07, E. F. Schwarzenberg 2L., R. J. Summers 2L.; from 1908--E. B. Hughes, C. V. Imlay, F. Izard, H. E. Merwin, D. O. Slater, F. E. Stacbner, T. R. Treadwell; from 1909--J. E. McGillicuddy, R. M. Middlemass, H. W. O'Connor, C. C. Reusch...
...Neagle 3L.; literature, W. L. Stoddard 1G.; freehand drawing, H. J. Spiuden 1G.; piano: R. L. Sweet '08; physics, F. E. Staebner '08; violin, E. C. Oberholzer '07; elementary arithmetic, F. M. Platts; geometry, S. E. Morrison '08; debating and public speaking and superintendent of classes, A. P. Matthew 2L.; current events, A. A. Ballantine...
...question, selected by Yale, was "Resolved, That it would be for the best interest of New York City to own its street railway system; the term 'street railway system' being taken to mean elevated, surface, and subway lines." A. H. Elder '07, G. W. Hinckley 3L., and A. P. Matthew 1L. represented the University and spoke on the affirmative side of the subject from choice. The Yale team, which defended the negative, was made up of E. H. Hart '07, J. N. Pierce 3D., and H. D. Smith 1D. The Coolidge Prize was won by A. H. Elder...
...meeting of the University, Debating Council in Dane Hall yesterday afternoon, the following men were elected members in recognition of their, work in the Yale debate: G. W. Hinckley 3L., C. A. Small 2L., A. P. Matthew, 1L., J. W. Russell 1L., and A. H. Elder '07. A vote of thanks was unanimously passed to R. T. Parke '98, who coached the team that defeated Yale on March...
...closing, Matthew summarized the affirmative case. The people of New York, he said, are at the mercy of a gigantic monopoly, which conducts the street railways not for the public benefit, but for private profit. The service is utterly inadequate, and unnecessarily so. The companies are deriving an extortionate profit, and they constitute a prolific source of political corruption. We can expect no relief from competition because there is no chance for competition. Regulation has invariably proved an inadequate remedy. Municipal ownership will mean a better and a cheaper service for the people because the system will be operated...