Search Details

Word: mccarran (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...influence-peddling variety, and 2) even more serious allegations of ideological corruption that led to failures of foreign policy. Last week, while the Republican National Committee was hurting that party's chances of walloping the Democrats on the first count, a Senate subcommittee headed by a Democrat, Pat McCarran of Nevada, brought in a highly damaging report against the Administration on the second...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: National Affairs: Report on the I.P.R. | 7/14/1952 | See Source »

...department was looking down its nose at nosy newsmen who had uncovered a secret State Department ban on any travel abroad by Professor Owen Lattimore. State insisted there was solid evidence (though it could not be specific) that the Johns Hopkins pundit, who has been under McCarthyist and McCarran committee fire for alleged pro-Communist activities, was planning a visit to the Iron Curtain domain. Retorted Lattimore, once a darling of State's Far Eastern experts: "Midsummer madness...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE ADMINISTRATION: Apology for a Fantasy | 7/7/1952 | See Source »

Ever since Publisher Hank Greenspun, 42, bought the Las Vegas Sun (circ. 8,500) in 1950, the. paper has been scowling at Nevada's Democratic Senator Pat McCarran and old Pat has been glaring right back. Two months ago their feud turned up in court. The Sun sued McCarran and 51 others, including the owners of Las Vegas' leading gambling houses, for $1,000,000. The charge: McCarran had persuaded the local gamblers to yank $8,000 a month in advertising from the paper after the Sun printed attacks against him. The gamblers denied the charge. Last week...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Press: The Sun v. McCarran | 6/16/1952 | See Source »

...temporary injunction to force nine gambling houses to put their regular ads back. Said Judge Foley: "The conspirators . . . cut off [the Sun's] bloodstream of existence . . . The abrupt cancellation of the advertising could very well [bring about] discontinuance of ... the newspaper." Judge Foley did not rule on whether McCarran had anything to do with the conspiracy. That will be decided when the Sun's main action goes to trial...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Press: The Sun v. McCarran | 6/16/1952 | See Source »

When it came to lining up votes, McCarran swamped his opponents. By 44-28, the Senate rejected a motion to return his bill to committee. By 51-27, it turned down a Lehman-Humphrey substitute bill. Then, the opposition giving up, the McCarran bill was passed by a voice vote...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: THE CONGRESS: Code for the Melting Pot | 6/2/1952 | See Source »

Previous | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | Next