Search Details

Word: mcveighs (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...confirm the lab's findings. The only witness the government would call from the lab itself is Steven Burmeister. He is treated neutrally in the part of the report that deals with the Oklahoma City bomb and is praised in other sections. He found the nitroglycerin and petn on McVeigh's clothes, and he can testify that they were never in the two sections of the lab where contamination was found. Whitehurst, meanwhile, is harshly criticized in the report. Yet even if the prosecution is right on the merits in this dispute, the lab's shortcomings will give Stephen Jones...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OKLAHOMA CITY: THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE | 4/28/1997 | See Source »

...will Stephen Jones, McVeigh's lead attorney, counterattack? First of all, he will use any evidence pointing to unidentified accomplices to argue that the real culprits are still at large. He will also try to suggest the bombing was the result of a worldwide conspiracy to which McVeigh was only tangentially associated, if at all. Jones has sent investigators to Europe, the Middle East and Asia. For months, he has talked about a German named Andreas Strassmeir, who met McVeigh in 1993; about Richard Snell, a white supremacist who was executed April 19, 1995; and about Ramzi Ahmed Yousef...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OKLAHOMA CITY: THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE | 4/28/1997 | See Source »

...reasoning backward from the fact that a receipt for ammonium nitrate fertilizer had been found at Nichols' house. In fact, while the evidence is consistent with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb, it does not exclude other possibilities. The report also leaves open the question of whether McVeigh's clothing might have been contaminated with nitroglycerin and petn in the lab. Jones will hammer away on these points. He will call Frederic Whitehurst, the whistle blower who brought about the lab investigation, and Jones will also try to have the report itself admitted into evidence...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OKLAHOMA CITY: THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE | 4/28/1997 | See Source »

Jones can also exploit the prosecution's failure to present witnesses who put McVeigh at the scene. Jones can simply say his client wasn't there. He can also ridicule the prosecution for its inability to present any witnesses who saw McVeigh and Nichols constructing the bomb, which would have involved hauling around two tons of fertilizer. This remains a hole in the prosecutors' story. They have dropped some witnesses who would have testified on the matter, and somehow, they will have to convince the jury that McVeigh and Nichols were so surreptitious they escaped detection...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OKLAHOMA CITY: THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE | 4/28/1997 | See Source »

After the bombing, Elliott first said that McVeigh was alone when he rented the truck, but then, the next day, Elliott said McVeigh had actually come with someone else--the famous John Doe No. 2; Beemer has said she remembers two men. The prosecution now maintains that McVeigh was by himself. Jones will try to use this confusion over John Doe No. 2 to question the accuracy of Elliott and Beemer's memories. (The prosecution probably will not even call Tom Kessinger, another employee at Elliott's whose statements about John Doe No. 2 have been the most sensational...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: OKLAHOMA CITY: THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE | 4/28/1997 | See Source »

Previous | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | Next