Search Details

Word: memorandums (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...statement was originally a January 11 memorandum from Hartman addressed to the faculty of the GSD. He last week released the memo for publication, maintaining that "it never reached the GSD faculty, but was acted upon by the Rogers Committee alone, in consultation with Dean (Maurice D.) Kilbridge...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: GSD Review Scrapped After Hartman Appeal | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

Rogers yesterday refused comment on whether the GSD faculty had in fact seen the Hartman memorandum...

Author: By Daniel Swanson, | Title: GSD Review Scrapped After Hartman Appeal | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

...following memorandum was just to Peter P. Rogers, associate professor of City Planning on January 11 by Chester W. Hartman '57 for presentation to the Graduate School of Design Faculty in anticipation of today's faculty meeting. The decision last week by Rogers and Maurice D. Killbridge, dean of the GSD, to begin Hartman's appeal proceeding again from scratch derived largely from Hartman's contentions in this memorandum, released to the Crimson by Hartman yesterday. Hartman, a former assistant professor of City Planning at the GSD, is currently on the faculty of design at the University of California...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Hartman, in Memorandum, Seeks a New Review | 2/11/1972 | See Source »

...Hunneman '28, said yesterday that, to his knowledge, Radcliffe has no plans at present to open to both sexes graduate prizes endowed "for women only." He said that he had prepared an opinion on the matter in his role as legal counsel to Radcliffe, but added that the memorandum "cannot be released at this time...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Harvard Will Instigate Legal Action To Open Restricted Graduate Prizes | 2/9/1972 | See Source »

...Faculty passed guidelines for hearing Hartman's appeal, introduced by Peter P. Rogers, associate professor of City Planning. But on December 31, 1970, Maurice D. Kilbridge, dean of the GSD, sent a memorandum to the faculty of the School saying that efforts to establish the five-man review committee called for in the Rogers Motion had proven futile because of the ambiguity of the guidelines. What he should have said was that the guidelines were worded so that any appeal carried out under them would be meaningless, and that responsible faculty members had refused to take part in such...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Hartman's Appeal | 12/16/1971 | See Source »

Previous | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | Next