Search Details

Word: microsoft (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...seem farfetched, but that's precisely what Microsoft charged. On Day Two of the trial, lead Microsoft lawyer John Warden accused Boies of trying to "demonize Bill Gates" and of casting Microsoft as "the great Satan." Bill Gates as Beelzebub is actually a familiar trope in computerland. The Internet is filled with discussion groups debating whether Gates is the devil and Microsoft the Evil Empire. Search the Web for sites that pair the words Gates and Satan, and you'll turn up tens of thousands of hits. Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig was a court-appointed monitor in an earlier...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Demonizing Gates | 11/2/1998 | See Source »

...government never did use the D word, but Justice Department lawyers have good tactical reasons for keeping Gates' own words and deeds at the heart of their case. Justice began its antitrust campaign against Microsoft with a straightforward claim that the company was guilty of improperly "bundling" its Internet Explorer browser into its popular Windows software. Judge Jackson bought the argument, but it was shot down by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals--a reversal that Microsoft viewed as decisive. Justice is now making a more wide-ranging argument that there is a pervasive pattern of Microsoft's using...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Demonizing Gates | 11/2/1998 | See Source »

...endorsement of the company itself, and were not carried out by rogue underlings. Personalizing the case also gets Justice out of an ideological quandary. The appeals courts that will probably hear this case--the D.C. Circuit and the Supreme Court--are fairly conservative on antitrust cases. The less the Microsoft case seems to be about antitrust doctrine and the more it is packaged as an attempt to rein in the behavior of a predatory company and CEO, the better Justice is likely to fare on appeal...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Demonizing Gates | 11/2/1998 | See Source »

...surprisingly, Microsoft has reacted indignantly to the government's "personal attacks on a visionary and innovator." John Warden, delivering Microsoft's opening statement, contended that Gates and his company had done nothing but engage in the hard-driving competition that is the essence of the free market. "The antitrust laws are not a code of civility in business," Warden told the court. He argued that Justice is trying to fix a software market that isn't broken. Microsoft is not a monopoly because there are few "barriers to entry" stopping would-be competitors from jumping in, Warden maintained. "There...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Demonizing Gates | 11/2/1998 | See Source »

Despite its difficulty in making the "bundling" argument, Justice has continued to build its case around the Internet browser--the principal software used to navigate the Internet. The government contends that Microsoft has been intent on overtaking Netscape's Navigator because it fears that such browsers may one day be used as an alternative operating system for computers in a way that could make Windows obsolete. Winning the browser war, Boies charged, was Microsoft's way of gaining "a choke hold on the Internet...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Demonizing Gates | 11/2/1998 | See Source »

Previous | 473 | 474 | 475 | 476 | 477 | 478 | 479 | 480 | 481 | 482 | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 | 488 | 489 | 490 | 491 | 492 | 493 | Next