Search Details

Word: middlesex (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Court’s ruling on the case ends a legal battle that began in late July 2003. Middlesex Superior Court Justice Nancy Staffier originally heard the suit and dismissed it in March...

Author: By Benjamin L. Weintraub, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Court Rejects Crimson’s Suit | 1/18/2006 | See Source »

...Court’s ruling on a case it heard on Nov. 7, 2005 ends a legal battle that began in late July 2003. The case was originally heard by Middlesex Superior Court Justice Nancy Staffier, who dismissed the suit in March...

Author: By Benjamin L. Weintraub, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Court Rejects Crimson Suit for Police Records | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

...Middlesex District Attorney Spokeswoman Emily LaGrassa said yesterday that the office had not yet received word of the charges. Catalano confirmed yesterday that there have been no arraignments in this investigation...

Author: By Robin M. Peguero, CRIMSON STAFF WRITER | Title: Students Question Police Dorm Search | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

...material facts are not in dispute. Harvard University is a private educational institution, and the HUPD provides campus security. Some officers of the HUPD have been appointed special State police officers pursuant to G.L. c. 22C, § 63, and some HUPD officers are deputy sheriffs in Middlesex and Suffolk counties. On June 2, 2003, the Harvard Crimson, Inc. (Crimson), a daily student newspaper, requested certain documents from the Cambridge police department and the HUPD, pursuant to G.L. c. 66, § 10. The Crimson subsequently made a request for documents from the Boston police department. It sought "all records, including...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

...Crimson's contention that documents in the custody of the HUPD have become "public records" because some HUPD officers have been appointed deputy sheriffs in Middlesex and Suffolk counties, thereby conferring on them the status of public employees, is equally unavailing. Pursuant to G.L. c. 37, § 3, a sheriff is vested with the discretion to appoint deputies who have general law enforcement powers and the right to serve process. See G.L. c. 37, §§ 11, 12. See also Tedeschi v. Reardon, 5 F.Supp.2d 40, 42 n. 3 (D.Mass.1998); Sheriff of Middlesex County v. International...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Text of Supreme Judicial Court Opinion in Crimson v. Harvard | 1/13/2006 | See Source »

Previous | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | Next