Search Details

Word: mistrial (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...with the De Lorean criminal case. I don't like the idea, and I sure don't like them involving me." FBI agents said that the name signed to the request letter seemed to be fictitious. Although at least one juror admitted having scanned the report, no mistrial was declared...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Los Angeles: Seeking to Influence a Jury | 7/9/1984 | See Source »

...guilty plea at his long and costly ($5 million) retrial, but was dissuaded by his attorneys. Editor Maynard kept the story secret until the trial was complete. He explained: "There was no doubt in my mind that if we had printed the story, it would have caused a mistrial, which could have forced yet another trial and the expenditure of still more millions...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Journalism Under Fire | 12/12/1983 | See Source »

...father-in-law, shouted: "You intended it, you scum! You scum, you useless piece of s---. You and Mailer and all the [other] creeps." The standing-room-only audience burst into applause, and court officials hustled Howard out of the courtroom. Fisher asked Judge Irving Lang to declare a mistrial. Lang promised a ruling Monday...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: He Was Dead: Jack Henry Abbott On Trial For Murdering Richard Adan | 1/25/1982 | See Source »

Ugast was aghast when some jurors told him that Virginia Starks had been secretly drinking for days during the trial, that during deliberations, Juanita Ross had joined her, and that Starks and Ross refused even to vote on the case. Ugast, in disgust, declared a mistrial, at a cost to the public estimated by Defense Attorney Grandison E. Hill to total $150,000. In another sense, the cost may be greater. The victim may not want to go through the anguish of testifying again, and without her there would likely be no case...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Americana: Hungover Jury | 5/18/1981 | See Source »

...detailed understanding of things like "reverse engineering," "cross elasticity of supply" and "subordinated debentures." The trial lasted 96 days. The jury heard 87 witnesses and examined some 3,000 exhibits. After deliberating for 19 more days, it could not reach a unanimous verdict. Federal Judge Samuel Conti declared a mistrial. He then ruled in favor of IBM, though the jury had favored Memorex by 9 to 2. Suspecting that the jurors were baffled by the whole case, Judge Conti began asking them questions about the evidence. The answers were confused. Declaring that "the magnitude and complexity of the present lawsuit...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Law: Now Juries Are on Trial | 9/3/1979 | See Source »

Previous | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Next