Search Details

Word: moralisms (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

What's the downside? I cannot see any. Both sides can still fight to keep abortion legal or illegal. But both can also work hard to reduce the moral and human toll of abortion itself. Why shouldn't a future Democratic candidate commit to an actual goal of reducing abortions nationally by, say, one-fifth in a four-year term? Alas, the pro-life side is leery. A key part of their coalition is made up of conservative Catholics who oppose any kind of birth-control devices; others are hostile to any adoption rights for gay couples. Still others...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Case for Compromise on Abortion | 2/27/2005 | See Source »

Something very unusual is happening to some Democrats and pro-choice abortion activists. They're getting smarter about their strategy. For years, they've harped on and on about a woman's right to choose, while failing to capture in any meaningful way the moral qualms so many of us have about abortion itself. So they often seemed strident, ideological and morally obtuse. They talked about abortion as if it were as morally trivial as a tooth extraction--not a profound moral choice that no woman would ever want to make if she could avoid...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Case for Compromise on Abortion | 2/27/2005 | See Source »

...Harvard model is ‘Veritas,’” Terry said. “Not just ‘Mom I broke the cookie jar’ truth—it stands for moral truth. But you have to put your money where your mouth is, and right now, Harvard’s money is where genocide...

Author: By Candice N. Plotkin, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Boston Students Rally for Divestment | 2/25/2005 | See Source »

Jacoby, director of the Center For Free Inquiry in New York City, was invited by the Humanist Chaplaincy of Harvard to speak on the much-publicized “moral values” issue in American politics...

Author: By Kristin E. Blagg, CONTRIBUTING WRITER | Title: Historian Speaks On Moral Values, Secularism | 2/25/2005 | See Source »

...their letter to their peers, Mahan and Terry claim, “that there is a clear moral imperative,” to withhold donations to the Senior Gift. We disagree, and see no reason that support for divestment and support for one’s Senior Gift should be considered mutually exclusive. To say that seniors who choose to donate are complicit in the horrifying situation in Darfur is ludicrous and forces an unfair and unnecessary choice on Harvard seniors. The Senior Gift’s mission is an intensely positive one, and its goals need not be jeopardized...

Author: By The Crimson Staff, | Title: Paved With Good Intentions | 2/25/2005 | See Source »

Previous | 469 | 470 | 471 | 472 | 473 | 474 | 475 | 476 | 477 | 478 | 479 | 480 | 481 | 482 | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 | 488 | 489 | Next