Word: nader
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1970-1979
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
Consumerist Ralph Nader has long been predicting that 1975 would be the year when America would awake to the potential dangers of nuclear power and begin to phase out new reactors from its energy plans. But so far, nothing of the sort has happened. There are 55 nuclear power plants-or "nukes," as they are called-operating in the U.S. today, and the Ford Administration wants 145 more built by 1985. Last week a new Harris poll indicated that the American people are ready to go along with that idea. Some 63% of them favor building more nukes, the poll...
Nuclear opponents promptly explained the results of the poll by saying that the public is simply not well informed about atomic energy. "It has been our experience," Nader adds, "that whenever people find out what the story is, they're overwhelmingly against nuclear power." So the critics are now talking of 1975 as a "year of education." Last week, to spread the word, they took two steps-both of them dramatic...
Then, in a more sensational move, citizen groups from 20 states asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to improve its contingency plans to save the most lives possible in the extremely unlikely event that a nuclear plant had a serious accident that would release lethal radioactivity. Such a disaster, Nader says, could cause "tens of thousands of casualties, billions of dollars in property damages, and long-term contamination of the affected land." To bring this scary message even closer to the public, antinuclear groups in 15 states last week petitioned their respective public utility commissions to order each utility to enclose...
Until now, Nader and his followers had pinned their hopes on getting legislative curbs on more nukes. For a while that strategy seemed to be working. A total of 21 states introduced measures to restrict development of nuclear power. But only two have acted: Vermont, which passed a law last April giving the legislature the right to approve (or turn down) future atomic reactors; and California, which will hold a referendum next June on whether, in effect, to ban nuclear plants. Almost all of the other proposals have either been voted down as totally impractical or tabled until next year...
...Curbs. The situation in Washington has been equally disappointing to Nader and his colleagues. The new Congress, which has many members who have professed serious misgivings about the peaceful atom, has so far failed to pass any bill to curb nuclear energy. The lawmakers are clearly reluctant to act against a technology that already supplies 8.5% of the nation's electricity and generates employment as well-especially when there are no alternative energy sources ready to be used. All this is not to deny that nuclear energy still poses many grave problems. But whether "education"-which to the Naderites...