Search Details

Word: nadering (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Consumerist Ralph Nader has long been predicting that 1975 would be the year when America would awake to the potential dangers of nuclear power and begin to phase out new reactors from its energy plans. But so far, nothing of the sort has happened. There are 55 nuclear power plants-or "nukes," as they are called-operating in the U.S. today, and the Ford Administration wants 145 more built by 1985. Last week a new Harris poll indicated that the American people are ready to go along with that idea. Some 63% of them favor building more nukes, the poll...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: Nader v. Nukes | 8/18/1975 | See Source »

Nuclear opponents promptly explained the results of the poll by saying that the public is simply not well informed about atomic energy. "It has been our experience," Nader adds, "that whenever people find out what the story is, they're overwhelmingly against nuclear power." So the critics are now talking of 1975 as a "year of education." Last week, to spread the word, they took two steps-both of them dramatic...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: Nader v. Nukes | 8/18/1975 | See Source »

Then, in a more sensational move, citizen groups from 20 states asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to improve its contingency plans to save the most lives possible in the extremely unlikely event that a nuclear plant had a serious accident that would release lethal radioactivity. Such a disaster, Nader says, could cause "tens of thousands of casualties, billions of dollars in property damages, and long-term contamination of the affected land." To bring this scary message even closer to the public, antinuclear groups in 15 states last week petitioned their respective public utility commissions to order each utility to enclose...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: Nader v. Nukes | 8/18/1975 | See Source »

Until now, Nader and his followers had pinned their hopes on getting legislative curbs on more nukes. For a while that strategy seemed to be working. A total of 21 states introduced measures to restrict development of nuclear power. But only two have acted: Vermont, which passed a law last April giving the legislature the right to approve (or turn down) future atomic reactors; and California, which will hold a referendum next June on whether, in effect, to ban nuclear plants. Almost all of the other proposals have either been voted down as totally impractical or tabled until next year...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Environment: Nader v. Nukes | 8/18/1975 | See Source »

...even development of alternate sources of energy will be needed. The nation must also find new pools of oil at home and drain every possible drop from already known domestic reserves. That has not been happening, and some critics, including former Federal Power Commission Head Lee White and Ralph Nader, charge that the oil industry has had an incentive to drag its feet in order to reduce the supply and force prices still higher. The evidence scarcely supports that accusation: petroleum producers lately have been sinking more holes into American soil than at any time since the mid-1960s. Trouble...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Business: Drilling More, Finding Less | 8/11/1975 | See Source »

Previous | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | 269 | 270 | 271 | 272 | 273 | 274 | 275 | Next