Word: nationalities
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: during 1890-1899
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
General References: Andover Review, II, 455 (Nov. 1884); Forum, X, 174 (Oct. 1890); L. P. Banks, "White Slaves"; Quar. Jour. Econ. I, 28 (Oct. '86); New Nation, Dec. '91, Jan. and Feb. '92. Pol. Sci. Monthly XIX, 400 (July 1881); Nation XXXVII 90 and 1' 5 (Aug. 2, 1883), also XXXVIII 136 (Feb. 14, 1884); Harper's LXXIII 250, 450, 571 (July, Aug., Sept., 1886); Fortnightly XX, 562 (Nov. '73) and XLVI...
...system of unrestricted competition is unsatisfactory as shown by - (a) Poor condition of laboring classes; "White Slaves" - (b) Tendency toward private monopolies; Quar. Jour. Econ. I, 28; Andover Rev. II, 455 - (c) Unnecessary waste of national resources; Fraser XXII 767, and Rev. 462; New Nation...
General references: Dr. Snow, Papers of American Historical Association, IV, 323-8; Nation, XVI, 234-5; Lowell, Essays on Government, Introduction and No. 1; International Review, IV, 243-50; Speeches of Morrill, Cox and Thayer in Congressional Globe, 38th Congress, 2nd Session, pp. 420-4, 437-44, 446-8; Morrill, Cong. Record, 46th Cong. 1st Session...
...ineffective. - (a) Mere right of debate would not enable cabinet to direct legislation: Snow, 123; Morrill, 424; Von Holst, Const. Law, Section 26. - (b) Information about the affairs of departments would not be more available. - (1) Cabinet officers would be under no compulsion to impart all their knowledge; Nation, XVI, 234. - 12) They could not be expected to furnish detailed information on demand; Morrill, 424.- (3) They would not be listened to when advocating measures repugnant to Congress - (4) Written reports furnish better basis for sound legislation, because poor speakers would fail to give clear expositions, while good speakers could...
...would cause personal attacks, badgering, etc.: Morrill, 422; Cox, 442-3. - (2) Of President, for criticism would indirectly injure him.- (b) Business of departments would suffer from absence of heads; Morrill, 424. - (c) It would force President to appoint cabinet officers for parliamentary ability rather than for executive power; Nation, XXVIII, 243. - (d) It would increase party dissensions: Cox, 438; Hare, Const. Law, I, 178. - (e) Serious complications would arise when executive and legislative were of different parties...