Search Details

Word: nato (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Last month Charles de Gaulle imperiously decreed that he wants all forces belonging to his 14 NATO partners removed from French soil by next April 1. He meant, of course, chiefly the Americans, whose 26,000 troops dwarf other national contingents, but he also intended to evict the NATO military headquarters in Rocquencourt, near Paris. Last week began the inevitable fencing aimed at delaying or modifying the departures. It was led off by some fancy footwork...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: NATO: Opening Duel | 4/22/1966 | See Source »

...same date, French officers in NATO's two military headquarters at Rocquencourt and Fontainebleau must pack their duffel bags and go home to strictly French military duties...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: NATO: Who Pays the Bill? | 4/8/1966 | See Source »

...April 1, 1967, the NATO military headquarters themselves must be dismantled, and all U.S. and Canadian troops now in France moved elsewhere. Delays may be possible in certain cases, such as an aircraft-repair complex near Châteauroux, which just happens to employ 2,900 French civilians...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: NATO: Who Pays the Bill? | 4/8/1966 | See Source »

...Gaulle's latest ultimatum coincided with a regular meeting in Paris of the NATO council, the political arm of the defense community, which De Gaulle has given leave to stay on in France in the hope of emphasizing a fine Gallic distinction: that France is withdrawing from NATO's military structure while remaining a member of the Atlantic Alliance. That is a bit of window dressing the U.S. is little disposed to allow De Gaulle. If the other NATO members will go along, Washington will likely try to move the NATO council out of France as well...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: NATO: Who Pays the Bill? | 4/8/1966 | See Source »

...Under Secretary of State George Ball, attending the NATO council meeting, had a few other questions. Who was going to pay for the move, which might cost as much as $1 billion? Ball argued that it ought to be France, which had unilaterally abrogated the NATO agreements. "Why should France contribute to an organization of which she is not a member?" replied a Gaullist spokesman loftily. In that case, hinted the U.S., NATO just might not move on De Gaulle's schedule-and then what would he do? Cut off the gas and electricity like any petty French propri...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: NATO: Who Pays the Bill? | 4/8/1966 | See Source »

Previous | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | Next