Word: nevertheless
(lookup in dictionary)
(lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first
(reverse)
...made a profit. "Steven and I are massively in the hole for Section Eight. Massively. We figured the other day that we are each $850,000 in the hole," Clooney says of the partnership, in which they have agreed to finance any project the other feels strongly about. Nevertheless, it's a relationship that he believes more star-director combos should attempt. "I think it's really irresponsible to make really crappy movies for the up-front money," he says. "If you need a job or are just coming up, by all means take the job. I was in Return...
...Viking hats and MAC quad-as-Beirut-table may never have materialized, but Paul and Andy have pulled off some pretty amazing photo shoots nevertheless. Credit for this year’s colorful covers, spreads and As it Were pages should go straight to this duo’s New Quincy pad. These self-titled media directors have drawn on their connections to get shots of the women’s basketball team, the ultimate team’s infamous dancing Santa and even unwilling friends. The only consolation for FM’s loss of these two? They?...
...Nevertheless, when I started looking around for the next big thing in grassroots organizing, I called Chris. I was looking for a cause that young people could throw their energy into, the way they threw themselves into beating Bush. I wanted to know what young organizers like Chris were going to try next. I was pretty sure the answer would be “i-banking” or “leaving the country,” but I had to try. Most of the people I spoke to said they planned to keep trying to make the country...
...good stewards of the earth, and we deserve every abuse Mother Nature heaps upon us. It's just too bad the rest of the world has to suffer with us. Cheryl Clark Calera, Oklahoma, U.S. Ghostly Goings-on Having resolved not to comment on Jennie Erdal's Ghosting I nevertheless wish to draw your attention to two aspects of your review [Nov. 29]. The overheated love letter to my wife, as quoted in the book and repeated in your review, is a total fabrication. I have no doubt that it adds to the entertainment value of the book...
Unfortunately, the justices’ role is to interpret the law, not to decide whether it is wise or misguided. Thus, this case is more of a test of federalism than an assessment of the medical utility of marijuana. Nevertheless, if the government did attempt to make an impartial examination of the latter, it would be hard pressed to make an informed decision, as it would be forced to rely on contradictory, even faulty scientific evidence...