Search Details

Word: nonunionized (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Many of the working controllers do not want their former colleagues back on the job, fearing that the friction would be worse than before. Declares Stan Recek, a nonunion controller in Miami: "I'll work seven days a week, 16 hours a day, to keep them from coming back." Nor do the supervisors want to go back to pushing paper. "I'm having a ball," says Mike Hughes, a supervisor in Miami. "I'm happier with my job now than I have been in the past three years...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Skies Grow Friendlier | 8/24/1981 | See Source »

Salaries for nonunion middle-management employees will be frozen at 1981 levels, and top executives will take...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Press: For Tonight, No More Tomorrows | 8/24/1981 | See Source »

Some 3,000 supervisors and 2,000 nonstriking or nonunion controllers were manning the towers and radar centers that monitor U.S. air flights. A backup force of some 500 military controllers, out of an available pool of 10,000, rushed to major air centers. They began studying civilian control procedures, and would begin to take up shifts this week if needed. Up to 700 military controllers can be reassigned to civilian posts with only a minimal effect on military operations; if the FAA needed more than 700, selective cutbacks in military flights would be required...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Turbulence in the Tower | 8/17/1981 | See Source »

...halt its decline, the Bulletin introduced morning editions. Then, under the Florida-based Charter Co., which bought the Bulletin last year for $31 million, the daily was redesigned and suburban editions were sharpened. The staff of 2,100 was trimmed by 125, and a wage freeze was imposed on nonunion employees. Advertisers and readers continued to defect, and losses grew...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Press: Grim Bulletin | 8/17/1981 | See Source »

...over three years and four months, as compared with 36% for a flat three years in the first contract. The most important question was a proposed change in the longstanding policy that required the coal companies to make royalty payments into union health and retirement funds when they bought nonunion coal. The union leadership's decision to drop that provision in the first contract had been the basis for the rank and file's rejection of the deal. The B.C.O.A. has now agreed to resume and even Increase the payments. Mineowners also retreated on another point of contention...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Energy: A New Coal Pact | 6/8/1981 | See Source »

Previous | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | Next