Search Details

Word: nots (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1890-1899
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

The South African Republic did not force this war unjustly, for England already had her hands at the throat of the Transvaal.

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Suzerainty was the basis of the English claims, and the arguments before introduced by Princeton on this point had not been met or refuted.

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Mayer, the next on rebuttal for Harvard, called attention to the fact that during the whole debate the negative had not even defined suzerainty. As for this suzerainty, England has claimed no more than any other nation, that of protection to her subjects in a foreign land. The negative has...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Weston opened by defining suzerainty as the general right of one nation to interfere in the internal affairs of another nation over which the right exists. In this controversy, the negotiations hinged on suzerainty and not on international law. England refused to accept specific reforms and the question came down...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Morse, who made the final rebuttal speech of the evening, summed up the preceding speeches of both sides. The claim that the condition of affairs in the Transvaal was intolerable, stood untouched by the negative. International law gave England the right to interfere for the protection of her subjects and...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: ANOTHER VICTORY. | 12/16/1899 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | Next