Search Details

Word: nuclearization (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...matter what kind of ABM deterrent system a country may install, it will not deter an enemy bent on using nuclear weapons. All the belligerent nation need do is deposit nuclear explosives underwater off the coast of the target country, wait until the winds are just right, and detonate the weapon. The fallout will inflict the damage...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Letters: Mar. 10, 1967 | 3/10/1967 | See Source »

Aware that Kennedy's speech would command considerable attention, the Administration took considerable pains to soften its impact. Before Bobby began speaking, Johnson casually dropped the news that Moscow had agreed to talks on "means of limiting the arms race in offensive and defensive nuclear missiles." The U.S., said the President, was anxious to dissuade the Russians from deploying an anti-ballistic missile system that might force Washington to increase drastically its own missile program. Just as Bobby took the floor, the President had a letter delivered to Washington's Democratic Senator Henry M. Jackson vowing that...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The War: Toughened Mood | 3/10/1967 | See Source »

Absolute Liberty. Stronger on polemics than on practical solutions, the New Left Catholics envision a socialistic society rooted in absolute liberty-which may be a contradiction in terms. Among their specific suggestions for reforming England are control of industry by the workers, abandonment of any nuclear deterrent. Within the church, they favor more democracy, including the election of bishops and more power for the laity in church affairs...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Roman Catholics: Disciples of Christ & Marx | 3/10/1967 | See Source »

Industrial Muscle. While the U.S. and the Soviet Union have sufficient oil and coal for their power needs, many of the have-not powers see in nuclear energy their first opportunity to tap a power source that will allow them to develop real industrial muscle. What most worries the have-nots is that the treaty's stipulations might impede their atomic progress; what most worries the U.S. and Russia is that each advance brings the have-nots closer to an atomic-weaponry potential. West Germany has a new "fast-breeder" reactor that generates electricity-and produces enough plutonium...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Armaments: Haves v. Have-Nots | 3/3/1967 | See Source »

...Russia insist that the treaty would not restrict the peaceful development of atomic energy and that they would share any peaceful scientific fallout from their nuclear-weaponry programs. As with the Partial Test-Ban Treaty, France and Red China are not expected to sign the non-proliferation treaty. The Americans and Russians hope that they will be able to persuade the have-nots to put aside their hesitations and go along with the treaty, but expect that the job of persuasion will take at least to fall, when they hope that the United Nations will take up the question...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Armaments: Haves v. Have-Nots | 3/3/1967 | See Source »

Previous | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | Next