Search Details

Word: oaths (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

Harvard graduated 133 men into the field of manufacturing in 1928, while 93 became lawyers. Eighty-seven men became teachers, 80 went into various phases of brokerage, while 71 took the Hippocratic Oath. Some of the more famous classmates...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: Roster of Returning Class Holds Many Famous Names | 6/8/1953 | See Source »

...author calls for a show of stamina to drive the politicians away from the academic scene. He asks, "Why should we in the North not show the backbone of the teachers in California who refused to take the oath?" It seems ironic somehow for a man who calls for a showing of backbones to show so blatantly his own backside. The CRIMSON in its attempt to protect its letter writers from recrimination, has been deceived into protecting the timorous. --William Mitchell...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: PROTECTING THE TIMOROUS | 5/27/1953 | See Source »

...suggestion is: Don't sign the teacher's oath. If enough people show stamina, the politicians will look elsewhere for their laurels. Why should we in the North not show the backbone of the teachers in California who refused to take the oath? Is not Boston the home of the original tea party? Name withheld by request

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: CHALLENGE TO DORGAN | 5/25/1953 | See Source »

There is a thing you have forgotten, the willful violation of the teacher's oath law. Two admit they were members of the Communist party and when they took the teacher's oath, they had no intention of upholding it, and this is a wilful and deliberate violation. And how do you know whether or not they are still members of the Communist party? Because they told you they got out of it nine years...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: UNDER OATH | 5/25/1953 | See Source »

...reason is the doctrine by which the Corporation could brand Professor Furry guilty of grave misconduct and yet retain him on the faculty. Though Furry had blatantly lied about a fact impinging on the national security (he was not under oath, and therefore broke no law) he was excused because the incident "occurred in a different climate of public opinion." Since when do climates of opinion justify dishonesty? In asking whether a possible employee was a Communist, the government of 1944 was worried about the same consequences as the government of 1953. This must have made the Corporation squirm somewhat...

Author: NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED | Title: The Outcome | 5/22/1953 | See Source »

Previous | 382 | 383 | 384 | 385 | 386 | 387 | 388 | 389 | 390 | 391 | 392 | 393 | 394 | 395 | 396 | 397 | 398 | 399 | 400 | 401 | 402 | Next