Search Details

Word: oaths (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

This controversy--as to which group, the Regents or the faculty, should determine teacher qualifications--raged from June 12, 1949 until April 21 of this year. On the first date the Regents established an oath of non-adherence to any "subversive" organizations: the oath was later revised under pressure of faculty protests. Then in February, 1950, the Regents voted that employees on the eight California campuses must either "sign or resign" by April 30. This ultimatum unified faculty indignation against the oath order so solidly that the Regents were forced to compromise their position on April 21 by agreeing...

Author: By Sedgwick W. Green, Daniel B. Jacobs, Paul W. Mandel, and John G. Simon, S | Title: Fight on California Oath Continues | 6/20/1950 | See Source »

Only a small faction has persistently resisted the idea of any oath at all. It is this group of 412 employees, including 42 full professors and 27 associate professors, which now faces dismissal for refusal to sign the latest proposal which the other 9507 employees have already accepted...

Author: By Sedgwick W. Green, Daniel B. Jacobs, Paul W. Mandel, and John G. Simon, S | Title: Fight on California Oath Continues | 6/20/1950 | See Source »

Warren Opposes Oath...

Author: By Sedgwick W. Green, Daniel B. Jacobs, Paul W. Mandel, and John G. Simon, S | Title: Fight on California Oath Continues | 6/20/1950 | See Source »

Throughout the controversy many persons have also questioned the constitutionality of the oath, including Governor Earl Warren, who sided with the faculty in opposing the Regents' oath. All employees of the university had already taken the regular oath of allegiance required of state employees by the state constitution. This oath includes the clause: "And no other oath, declaration, or test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust...

Author: By Sedgwick W. Green, Daniel B. Jacobs, Paul W. Mandel, and John G. Simon, S | Title: Fight on California Oath Continues | 6/20/1950 | See Source »

...Monroe E. Deutsch, vice president and provost emeritus, has said: "As Governor Warren and others have pointed out, the oath would at once be taken by Communists without a word of protest. It is argued then, when their membership in the party is disclosed, they can be dismissed for perjury. It is, however, my understanding that the Regents would in any event, without further ado, dismiss any known Communist. What then is the need or value of the oath...

Author: By Sedgwick W. Green, Daniel B. Jacobs, Paul W. Mandel, and John G. Simon, S | Title: Fight on California Oath Continues | 6/20/1950 | See Source »

Previous | 429 | 430 | 431 | 432 | 433 | 434 | 435 | 436 | 437 | 438 | 439 | 440 | 441 | 442 | 443 | 444 | 445 | 446 | 447 | 448 | 449 | Next