Search Details

Word: osbornes (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: during 1960-1969
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Austin, her job with Dodge has never taken her to Detroit, she knows few of the Chrysler Corp.'s top brass, and until she was spotted for the Dodge Rebellion by Don Schwab, Hollywood producer for Manhattan-based advertising agency Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, she was virtually unknown. Pam was under contract to Warner Bros, and MGM, made a few pilot films for TV, and did a stint as a dancer in Tony Martin's nightclub act, but her career was going nowhere. The Dodge Rebellion revolutionized all that. Last year she earned $34,000 plus residuals...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Advertising: Calamity Pam | 1/13/1967 | See Source »

...that, Warren approved the use of informers in two related cases. Hoffa Lawyer Z. T. Osborn Jr. was appealing his own conviction (3½ years) for trying to slip $10,000 to one of Hoffa's Chattanooga jurors. In Osborn's case, the informer was Policeman Robert Vick, who had originally been hired by Osborn to investigate Hoffa's Nashville jurors, and who was later asked by Osborn to help bribe a prospective juror. By then, Vick had switched sides, and with approval of two judges, the feds had armed him with a tape recorder into which...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: A Pragmatic View of Privacy | 12/23/1966 | See Source »

...upholding Osborn's conviction, the court ruled that Vick's tape was completely valid evidence under the Fourth Amendment standard of judicially approved search and seizure. Warren agreed: "I see nothing wrong with the Government thus verifying the truthfulness of the informer and protecting his credibility." Moreover, Warren himself wrote the majority opinion in a third case approving the tactics of a U.S. narcotics agent, who phoned Boston Marijuana Peddler Duke Lee Lewis at home, called himself "Jimmy the Polack" and arranged for Lewis to sell him eleven "bags" (71.5 grams) for $100. Although the Fourth Amendment shields...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: A Pragmatic View of Privacy | 12/23/1966 | See Source »

...case narcotics agent to get a search warrant, for which he had probable cause. In Hoffa, even though Douglas voted to dismiss on technical grounds, he denounced the Government for " 'planting' a friend in a person's entourage so that he can secure incriminating evidence." In Osborn, Douglas argued that even prior judicial approval of Vick's bugging violated the Fourth Amendment ban against a search designed to uncover anything more than the loot or the tools of a crime. Moreover, he insisted, using such evidence as Osborn's tape-recorded words violated the Fifth...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: A Pragmatic View of Privacy | 12/23/1966 | See Source »

...charge of taking a bribe from a trucking company. Hoffa protests that the Justice Department's tampering evidence came from a "spy," planted among his entourage, who violated his right to counsel by attending some of Hoffa's conferences with his attorney. Hoffa Lawyer Z. T. Osborn Jr., who got 3½ years for tampering with another Hoffa jury, protests the Government's use of a recorder taped to the back of another "spy." On these cases hang not only the defendants' fate but also Government use of informers and electronic eavesdropping-practices that raise complicated...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: The Supreme Court: Out of Business | 10/14/1966 | See Source »

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Next