Search Details

Word: packwoods (lookup in dictionary) (lookup stats)
Dates: all
Sort By: most recent first (reverse)


Usage:

...Packwood's former wife told the Post that she had no reason to think that Packwood had offered his friends any political favors in exchange for job offers -- a quid pro quo that could be illegal. She told the Oregonian newspaper, however, that when one of the lobbyists, Steven Saunders, called Packwood to see if his offer of work might present the Senator with a conflict of interest, Packwood's response surprised Saunders. "Bob wanted to know, 'How much money do you think you could pay her? How much money could she earn a year?' " she said. "Bob got coercive...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Packwood Vs. Packwood | 11/15/1993 | See Source »

What has exasperated Packwood's colleagues most is his inept handling of the ethics committee's inquiry. First he concealed the existence of his diaries from the committee. When the committee demanded all 8,200 pages, he tried to intimidate fellow Senators by warning that the release of further pages would expose other legislators' sexual dalliances...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Packwood Vs. Packwood | 11/15/1993 | See Source »

...performance on the Senate floor last week was no better. On Monday, summoned to debate the diaries, Senators listened to Packwood deliver a rambling, ranting soliloquy that basically charged the committee with prying into his private life. Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski countered, "We are not the Senate Select Committee on Voyeurism." When the droning debate tied up Senate business for a second full day, legislators grew impatient. Finally Tuesday evening, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia implored his embattled colleague to sacrifice himself for the larger good: "None of us is without flaws. But when those flaws damage the institution...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Packwood Vs. Packwood | 11/15/1993 | See Source »

Many other Senators, who are still smarting from Packwood's veiled threat of two weeks ago, privately agree that he should resign. That step not only would bring a rapid end to the ethics committee's sexual-misconduct inquiry, prompted by allegations by at least 26 women, but would also spare the Senate the discomfort of deciding what punitive action to take if the charges prove convincing (although his resignation would not prevent the women from pursuing lawsuits). If he fails to resign, the ethics committee may decide to push forward shortly with open hearings on the sexual-harassment charges...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Packwood Vs. Packwood | 11/15/1993 | See Source »

...Packwood vows to serve out his fifth term and fight the subpoena for his diaries. Although the federal court is expected to move quickly on the Senate's request, if Packwood is not satisfied with the outcome, he threatens an appeal that "could take years." If he runs out the appeals process and still refuses to comply, Packwood could face civil contempt penalties. Meanwhile, he creates an opportunity for the committee to delve further into the possibility of criminal misconduct. Packwood's unfortunate pattern is that each attempt he makes to preserve his privacy seems to turn up the wattage...

Author: /time Magazine | Title: Packwood Vs. Packwood | 11/15/1993 | See Source »

Previous | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next